It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't think any particular part of the mass is specified. The torso is the larger part of the body and thus, the torso is the target. Aiming for the center of the torso increases the likelihood of a hit.
Does not police training recommend aiming for the upper part of the mass?
Yes. I know. Is a lung shot always fatal?
said heart and lungs just to let you know.
As has been pointed out, the discussion is not about whether or not the use of deadly force is suggested in any particular situation. It is about "shooting him in the leg."
Although these types of situations are close combat, with the person in question with no visible gun.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: Phage
Does not police training recommend aiming for the upper part of the mass? I said heart and lungs just to let you know. I am a victim of the information posted on this forum in terms of guidelines and the videos posted . I have not seen a clip (seen a few) where a single shot has been fired and it has not hit the upper part of the persons "mass". Multiple shot /panic type shooting results in multiple entry wounds all around the body. Although these types of situations are close combat, with the person in question with no visible gun.
originally posted by: MasterKaman
a reply to: WeRpeons
The first piece of sensible thoughts in this thread full of macho trainee killers ! Please ALL understand there are TWO psychological Stages an officer should (and usually does) go thru (1) the THREAT and minor use of weapons, such as shots around feet. Then if that doesn't work, or the crim draws his own gun, only THEN (2) should an officer fire in a more life endangering way.
Could have fooled me.
I didn't follow the the path of the thread and was just responding to the OP.
not talking about the 10% citizens who are trainee Jason Bournes, that need instant vaporising. but 90% average criminals do NOT need to be shot in the chest or back (which frequently kills). a running (or advancing) crook would only need a couple of shots round his feet or into his leg to stop him. and why not use Tasers much more frequently ? the answer is LACK of police training, always aiming for the chest is not necessary. they should calm down and try stepping BACK for a bit of thought and aiming.
You mean asking questions? You might start here:
And I know lung shots aren't always fatal. I always wonder why you take that form of debate.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: Reallyfolks
Thanks for the response. It's a shame I'm portraying myself as the type to play the "weight card"...
I suppose it depends on whether they are facing you or sideways..
You ask stupid questions that ditract from the original point.