The Bilderbergers are poised to win with a mandate.

Lucky Bernie Sanders. He has A LOT of cards stacked in his favor. He is poised to win it all with a MANDATE. It's amazing all the 'coincidental' variables that came together so perfectly for him:

• Hillary has a 'trickling out' email scandal always in the headlines.

• Currently, only two democrat party candidates have any chance of winning.

• Biden may enter the race & if he does, he will take mainly Hillary votes because of the email scandal & because they are more closely matched on policy.

• Biden has waited so long to enter the race, Bernie has been able to solidify his supporters.

• Hillary is running a curiously lackluster campaign -- especially when compared to her 2008 campaign.

• On the other hand, republicans have 17 candidates that are all very similar -- except Trump -- and with so many running no one has a huge amount of support -- except Trump.

• Trump has been reminding republicans that all the others are 'the same' & has spent all his time criticizing the party and turning voters away from it.

• Trump is running an unpredictable campaign & can go independent to fracture the conservative vote so significantly, Bernie would win by enough to give him a mandate.

• Trump has a long history as a registered democrat and DNC supporter, and a long history joining political parties and then tearing them down before he leaves them during election season -- case in point, the Reform Party, in 2000.

• If Trump is the nominee, at any moment he could completely sabotage his own campaign with his bizarre mildly vague polarizing comments, plus he's unelectable having praised democrats so much in the past and supported universal, single payer healthcare AND the highest tax on the wealthy ever, to pay off the national debt in one year -- so that will neuter his debate on Bernie's socialist positions.

***

Someone sure is smiling on Bernie, because an avowed socialist would normally never have a chance to win it all with a mandate under ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES. It couldn't be working out better for Bernie if it had been PLANNED for him to win.

Bernie may very well be a swell guy and even a good leader....BUT THE PERFECT ALIGNING OF ALL THE STARS AND PLANETS IN BERNIE'S FAVOR CREEPS THE H*LL OUT OF ME. It's a huge red flag.

And I am not comforted by knowing it was Joseph Retinger -- a Polish Socialist like Bernie Sanders -- who founded The Bilderberg Group. I do believe The Powers That Be are going to win, and the voters will lose again.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Who are the Bilderberg Group? (I will proceed to research now).

I ovbiously don't rub elbows with them as I have never heard of them.

a reply to: NewzNose

Ha! Well none of us rub elbows with The Bilderberg Group. But Hillary and Obama attended their annual meeting in 2008.

They are the Puppetmasters -- please do check them out, and the Trilateral Commission.

In a nutshell: "Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference."

Basically, they get together annually to decide the course of the global economy. For example, they were behind the oil crisis in the 1970s.

All of our political leaders are beholden to The Bilderberg Group. Both parties.

If Sanders wins, you have no one to blame but the Republicans, isn't it about time they fielded a decent candidate for a presidential election? Not 17 losers

a reply to: MotherMayEye

No.

Bernie opposes everything this 'group' allegedly 'stands for'.

I think the whole Bilderberger conspiracy theory is just another Alex Jones scam.

originally posted by: woodwardjnr
If Sanders wins, you have no one to blame but the Republicans, isn't it about time they fielded a decent candidate for a presidential election? Not 17 losers

The biggest myth is that the Republican and Democratic parties do not work hand and hand.

Just as the Bushes and Clintons worked together to trade guns for drugs out of Mena, Arkansas during the Iran Contra scandal, the two parties continue to work together today. And they keep the voters clueless by pretending there is a great partisan divide.

Sometimes The Bilderberg Group needs republican policies to further their agenda, sometimes they need democratic policies to further their agenda. But there is only ONE AGENDA for the global elite.

And when neither Hillary nor Jeb are nominated, the voters will be totally convinced that our elections are not manipulated from the inside by the two parties who conspire together for The Bilderberg Group. But they are.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

No.

Bernie opposes everything this 'group' allegedly 'stands for'.

I think the whole Bilderberger conspiracy theory is just another Alex Jones scam.

What? They make no secret of their annual conference.

Also, and again, the founder of the Bilderberg Group was Joseph Retinger -- a Polish socialist just like Bernie Sanders.

Why would the elite want to compete with the rest of us in a free-market capitalist economy when they can control the wealth by doling it out to the rest of us as they see fit in a socialist economy?


(Also, I have never visited Alex Jones disinfo website in my life.)

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Thank you for the insight. Does this Bilderberg Group support any specific party or candidate in the running of POTUS.

If this *group* decide the course of global economy, the have failed many countries. Unless the collapse of Greece, downturn of China and even the downward spiral of our own country, USA, was all part of this *mandate*?

Maybe they have no elbows...

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't say they don't exist. I said I think the conspiracy theory about them is an Alex Jones scam.

a reply to: NewzNose

Unfortunately, I am not privy to what serves them. But they have been behind many 'economic disasters' since their founding. All the money sucked from 'tanked' economies winds up somewhere.

I think all the cards are playing out to give Bernie Sanders the win.

Personally, I don't have any horse in the race and have already accepted it's Bernie that will win. And I do blame Trump and his supporters for making it happen. If Trump goes independent and takes enough conservative votes, Bernie will win by a landslide and have a MANDATE to march forward with his socialist policies.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't say they don't exist. I said I think the conspiracy theory about them is an Alex Jones scam.

I tend to stick with reputable information sources and take it all with a grain of salt, too.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't say they don't exist. I said I think the conspiracy theory about them is an Alex Jones scam.

You don't have to take my word for anything, please dig in and make up your own mind. But dig in, at least. Don't wave it away by assuming it's an Alex Jones-type conspiracy theory.

Read up on Jospeh Retinger, The Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral commission. BTW, Joseph Retinger -- again, he's a socialist -- was one of the founders of what ultimately became the EU, too.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I didn't say they don't exist. I said I think the conspiracy theory about them is an Alex Jones scam.

Also, you honestly believe that when 150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media get together to discuss the course of the global economy and talk 'politics,' they are just looking out for the best interest of the people?

Do current events indicate that is the case to you?

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I'm a socialist if you're trying to scare me with that word, it won't work.

To your next post. There's several meetings of the business elite with world leaders every year. I don't know why the Bilderberg one would carry more conspiracy weight than any of the others.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I'm a socialist if you're trying to scare me with that word, it won't work.

To your next post. There's several meetings of the business elite with world leaders every year. I don't know why the Bilderberg one would carry more conspiracy weight than any of the others.

Not at all. I have considered myself to be socialist and remain open to socialism. I happen to also believe that the federal government is corrupt and has ZERO oversight. So I am very reluctant to give them more wealth to spend when so many government leaders are beholden to special interests, personal interests, crony interest....

What 'others' are you referring to? Maybe I can offer an answer.

Do not mistake me for being a republican or a democrat...or a tea partier, libertarian, progressive, or otherwise.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

No.

Bernie opposes everything this 'group' allegedly 'stands for'.

I think the whole Bilderberger conspiracy theory is just another Alex Jones scam.

Then obviously you have not done any homework on the subject and are just throwing out vague statements.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye


Not at all. I have considered myself to be socialist and remain open to socialism.

a reply to: GD21D

Is there something more taboo about that word than the word 'capitalism?' I don't get it? It's not like I am calling socialsm 'communism.'

What's the big deal with talking about socialism?

originally posted by: southbeach

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MotherMayEye

No.

Bernie opposes everything this 'group' allegedly 'stands for'.

I think the whole Bilderberger conspiracy theory is just another Alex Jones scam.

Then obviously you have not done any homework on the subject and are just throwing out vague statements.

Thank you. This is exactly why I always pause before sharing on ATS. Too many people make up their minds without giving any thought to the topic.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

The G-6, G-7, G-8, G-20, World Economic Forum, World Leaders Conference... there's dozens.