Bernie Sanders and "top secret" emails are catching up to Hillary Clinton

As Bernie Sanders is making news drawing large crowds to his political rallies, Hilary is making news too. In Hilary's case it is over her use of a private email server and the legality of top secret documents that were on it.

Talk about a bad moment for Hillary Clinton. It's too early to say that the Clinton juggernaut is in danger of sinking, but it is taking on water — and fast.

Here's what we've learned in the last 24 hours:

1 The email server Clinton wiped clean is headed to the Justice Department.

2 Some of the emails she already had turned over to State contained material that could be deemed "top secret."

3 Bernie Sanders is now leading her in New Hampshire

Go away Hilary!!!

Go Bernie!

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Hillary isn't going to quit. She never does. The Grand Prize awaits her, finally. Total world domination is but one election fraud away.

"I came, I saw, everyone died." (insert maniacal laughter).

Hillary has some big problems.

Now the Bernie Campaign must focus on Joe Biden.

If TPTB@DNC feel a threat from Bernie, they will find the easiest and least corrosive way to get Biden "in".

One easy way would be to have Obama resign this year.

That way Biden becomes the incumbent and makes a win in 2016 more possible.

[email protected]

a reply to: AlaskanDad

I hope he runs v trump!.
Wish I could vote .
Nearer the time it would be great for a USAer to explain to us jonny foreigners how the candidates are picked? At some college isn't it?.
I have not a clue .

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: AlaskanDad


"I came, I saw, everyone died." (insert maniacal laughter).

Hilarious!

The Clinton Body Count grows.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Hillary has some big problems.

Now the Bernie Campaign must focus on Joe Biden.

If TPTB@DNC feel a threat from Bernie, they will find the easiest and least corrosive way to get Biden "in".

One easy way would be to have Obama resign this year.

That way Biden becomes the incumbent and makes a win in 2016 more possible.

[email protected]

FTA:

Sanders leads Clinton 44-37 percent among likely Democratic primary voters, the first time the heavily favored Clinton has trailed in the 2016 primary campaign, according to the poll of 442 Granite-Staters.

Vice President Joe Biden got 9 percent support in the test primary match-up. The other announced Democrats in the race, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and former Virginia Gov. Jim Webb, barely register at 1 percent or below.

I wonder if they will announce proof O'Bummer is not a US citizen so Bidden can get the presidency???

Bernie Sanders is a socialist FYI....you know, like Stalin, Mao, Pot, Mussolini and every despotic tyrant of South America for the last half century....
So congratulations on supporting his ilk...I hope you enjoy horizontal income potential...but for those of us who enjoy capitalism and the chance to achieve whatever our brain and work ethic can yield then he is a terrifying candidate...
President Obama is a socialist in all but self-awareness....at least Sanders admits his preposterous belief in the second most despicable form of governance...Islamo-fascism holds that prize at the moment...
-Christosterone

originally posted by: AlaskanDad

I wonder if they will announce proof O'Bummer is not a US citizen so Bidden can get the presidency???

Possible.

But the problem is with the sealed adoption records (Hawaii).

Nobody can break the sealed records without just cause.

(don't ask how I know)

a reply to: Christosterone

Ah but there have been other socialists in the US of A:

The creation of the CCC In 1932, when the American public voted President Herbert Hoover out of office, they were searching for an end to the economic chaos and unemployment that had gripped the nation for two years. They turned to a man promising a better life than the one they had known since the beginning of the Great Depression — Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Roosevelt was not interested in the dole. He was was determined, rather, to preserve the pride of American workers in their own ability to earn a living, so he concentrated on creating jobs. CCC enrollees In his first 100 days in office, President Roosevelt approved several measures as part of his "New Deal," including the Emergency Conservation Work Act (ECW), better known as the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). With that action, he brought together the nation's young men and the land in an effort to save them both. Roosevelt proposed to recruit thousands of unemployed young men, enlist them in a peacetime army, and send them to battle the erosion and destruction of the nation's natural resources. More than any other New Deal agency, the CCC is considered to be an extension of Roosevelt's personal philosophy.

source

From hydro electricity to parks and conservation, we as Americans still enjoy many of the benefits of the CCC or should I say socialism? Not to mention the end of the first great depression!

a reply to: boymonkey74

It's an antiquated system that needs to be done away with. There are are 538 "electors" with each state having the same number of electors as they do Congressmen plus 3 additional electors from Washington, D.C. (which isn't in a state and has no Congressmen, just a non-voting delegate). Basically, the votes are cast and tallied and then except for a couple of states, whoever wins the state gets all of the electoral votes. The candidate that gets 270 votes or more wins. If nobody hits that number, the House of Representatives pick the President (that's scary).

Now in about half the states, there are no laws that prevent electors from casting their vote for their state's loser or from not voting at all. Not only is there no benefit to doing things this way, it can also lead to situations where somebody wins the popular vote but doesn't win the election. It's happened 4 times:

1824 - Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, got less than half of the electoral votes and John Quincy Adams was picked by the House of Representatives.

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes got 185 electoral votes and defeated Samuel Tilden who only got 184 electoral votes but won the popular vote.

1888 - Grover Cleveland won the popular vote by 90,000 votes (out of about 11 million) but lost to Benjamin Harrison because he only got 168 electoral votes to Harrison's 233.

2000 - Al Gore won the popular vote and lost to George Bush when the SCOTUS stopped recounts in Florida and Bush received their 25 electoral votes.

(votes / percent / electoral votes)

Bush: 50,456,002 ... 47.87% ... 271
Gore: 50,999,897 ... 48.38% ... 266

a reply to: theantediluvian

So you'd be fine with large population centers determining every election, then?

Do people living in New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago represent the views of everybody in America?

Obviously you missed the point of the electoral college.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Ah cheers for that.
If I learn something new everyday it has been a successful day .

a reply to: Christosterone

Bernie is a Democratic Socialist - not the same thing at all as Mao, Stalin or Mussolini. What do you think Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, unemployment insurance, and food stamps are? Democratic Socialism.

a reply to: kaylaluv

It would be great if more people knew the difference.

The lines have been blurred by Conservatives to mean "Anyone who wants to use government money to help people is a Socialist."

Can anyone else hear that sound in the distance....??? Sort of a wet, sticky or sloppy repeating pattern....Splak, splak, splak......

That is the sound of the .1% scurrying around in fear to hide their money off shore.

Go Get Em Bernie!!

Bern down those stained ivory towers.

a reply to: mOjOm

a reply to: kaylaluv

I'm pickin' up that groove you're layin down baby.....and I'm diggin it!!

a reply to: mOjOm

Me, too!

There's a whole year for people to decide that he could and should be the nominee. He CAN beat Hills and the more people know about him, the more support he has. I'm loving this!

Bern, baby, Bern!

originally posted by: Answer
a reply to: theantediluvian

So you'd be fine with large population centers determining every election, then?

Do people living in New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago represent the views of everybody in America?

Obviously you missed the point of the electoral college.

as of 2014, Wyoming had a population of 584,153.... and had 2 senators in congress.....as of 2014, California had a population of 38,802,500....and had 2 senators in congress.....yeah...that's fair representation...
fcw.com...

so in the senate, 584,000 people in Wyoming, represent the amount of senate legislative power as 38.8 million people in California

originally posted by: Christosterone
Bernie Sanders is a socialist FYI....you know, like Stalin, Mao, Pot, Mussolini and every despotic tyrant of South America for the last half century....
So congratulations on supporting his ilk...I hope you enjoy horizontal income potential...but for those of us who enjoy capitalism and the chance to achieve whatever our brain and work ethic can yield then he is a terrifying candidate...
President Obama is a socialist in all but self-awareness....at least Sanders admits his preposterous belief in the second most despicable form of governance...Islamo-fascism holds that prize at the moment...
-Christosterone

You seriously just compared Bernie Sanders to Pol Pot?

What kind of world are you living on, wow - that comment is comedy gold.

Just wow... I don't even want to begin to dissect the ignorance in that comment.