It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Kind of like when a company presents themselves as something they aren't to gain access to information they have no business having access to, signs a confidentiality agreement for that information, then breaks said agreement to release edited versions of that information?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Kind of like when a company presents themselves as something they aren't to gain access to information they have no business having access to, signs a confidentiality agreement for that information, then breaks said agreement to release edited versions of that information?
How else does one investigate illegal activity? You're shooting at the messenger.
I don't hear you complain when the NSA does similar things in the "War on Terror".
Well for STARTERS how about releasing your evidence to the proper authorities so that they can comb through it correctly instead of directly releasing it to the public to taint it and create emotional reactions to it?
I've already told you in another thread that I don't support the War on Terror so this red herring isn't even relevant to me.
originally posted by: intrptr
Because you can whistle blow to your bosses all day and they will just fire you and continue to cover up any illegality.
Thats why I brought it up. You cover for the government by saying you don't see any conspiracy (in that other thread) and when the whistleblowers come forward you attack them for coming forward.
originally posted by: kellyjay
i think a question needs to be asked here, if stem express had their own employees in these PP clinics carrying out the labour, and putting the specimens together and shipping them off, then what costs exactly were PP being reinbursed for?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Kind of like when a company presents themselves as something they aren't to gain access to information they have no business having access to, signs a confidentiality agreement for that information, then breaks said agreement to release edited versions of that information?
originally posted by: kellyjay
i think a question needs to be asked here, if stem express had their own employees in these PP clinics carrying out the labour, and putting the specimens together and shipping them off, then what costs exactly were PP being reinbursed for?