It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: beezzer
No. This is how I will retain perspective about what things are real and what things are hyperbolic talking points. A problem that somebody makes up as a political meme is not actually a problem... it's a political trope.
Not true. Some of us realize that it is not feasible to deport all of them and we have to slowly integrate them in to society. Allowing them to travel legally to a job so they can help pay taxes seems reasonable.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: beezzer
All 31 credible cases of voter impersonation out of roughly one billion?
Sigh.
So roughly the same ratio as being shot by a cop.....
originally posted by: ketsuko
I nominate California for a new policy - I'll call it legal relativism. You can follow any laws you like ... or not ... or you can make up your own laws and follow them and when you go to court, the judge will say, "Who am I to judge? Your law is just as valid as his law."
originally posted by: beezzer
Just wondering how you on the left would justify illegals voting.
You don't have a problem with them breaking the law anyways.
They are here illegally, so the law is not important to any of you.
So if anyone violates the law, breaks the law in anything, it must be okay, because you all seem to be fine with only an arbitrary adhesion to the law.
You'll all look like a bunch of stinking hypocrites.
we will integrate you into our society
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: ketsuko
I nominate California for a new policy - I'll call it legal relativism. You can follow any laws you like ... or not ... or you can make up your own laws and follow them and when you go to court, the judge will say, "Who am I to judge? Your law is just as valid as his law."
Hells yeah buddy and we will even throw you into a job if you aren't supposed to be here just so you can pay some taxes.....Ohhhhh Introvert has me fired up! (again)....lol
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: beezzer
If you are asking if I think that the 31 cases documented should be prosecuted? Absolutely.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: ketsuko
I nominate California for a new policy - I'll call it legal relativism. You can follow any laws you like ... or not ... or you can make up your own laws and follow them and when you go to court, the judge will say, "Who am I to judge? Your law is just as valid as his law."
Hells yeah buddy and we will even throw you into a job if you aren't supposed to be here just so you can pay some taxes.....Ohhhhh Introvert has me fired up! (again)....lol
Hey, we agree. If they are already here we might as well put em to work.
We don't complain when they are digging ditches or mowing lawns, but complain when they want a licence to drive.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: ketsuko
I nominate California for a new policy - I'll call it legal relativism. You can follow any laws you like ... or not ... or you can make up your own laws and follow them and when you go to court, the judge will say, "Who am I to judge? Your law is just as valid as his law."
Hells yeah buddy and we will even throw you into a job if you aren't supposed to be here just so you can pay some taxes.....Ohhhhh Introvert has me fired up! (again)....lol
Hey, we agree. If they are already here we might as well put em to work.
We don't complain when they are digging ditches or mowing lawns, but complain when they want a licence to drive.
We also find that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective. Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted.