It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: grandmakdw
We could have killed 1,000 of the greatest minds to ever walk the Earth because of this garbage!
Odds are....out of over 60 million abortions, we most probably have killed 1,000's of great minds, future scientists, doctors, with a high probability we've killed some Martin Luther Kings and Mother Teresa's, as well.
Sadly, the world will never know how great it's loss.
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: grandmakdw
We could have killed 1,000 of the greatest minds to ever walk the Earth because of this garbage!
Odds are....out of over 60 million abortions, we most probably have killed 1,000's of great minds, future scientists, doctors, with a high probability we've killed some Martin Luther Kings and Mother Teresa's, as well.
Sadly, the world will never know how great it's loss.
Well at least someone agrees with me.....I feel I am fighting alone with Randyvs on most of these threads!
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: grandmakdw
We could have killed 1,000 of the greatest minds to ever walk the Earth because of this garbage!
Odds are....out of over 60 million abortions, we most probably have killed 1,000's of great minds, future scientists, doctors, with a high probability we've killed some Martin Luther Kings and Mother Teresa's, as well.
Sadly, the world will never know how great it's loss.
Well at least someone agrees with me.....I feel I am fighting alone with Randyvs on most of these threads!
originally posted by: windword
Raise your hands if...........or, quote this post with a , if you want to see ALL abortion banned in the USA!
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Willtell
Babies lives matter... but don't put the blame on PP because they're not making women get abortions. They're merely providing a service for anyone who needs it.
Would people rather abortion be outlawed again and women resort to back alley abortions?
originally posted by: theNLBS
a reply to: Willtell
Hey, I think the link in your OP in busted. I would like to add a comment though.
A couple of things are left out of the Planned Parenthood dialogue. A important one, in my opinion, is birth control. Ever heard of Ovarian Cysts?
About 8% of premenopausal women develop large cysts that need treatment.1 source
Do you know how they treat this cysts? Hormone therapy using birth control pills. Ever try to buy Birth control without insurance? It's around $150 a packet, which is about a month's worth. If you go through Planned Parenthood, $100 can get you an entire years worth of birth control.
Abortions are just a small fraction of the service Planned Parenthood provides.... Just sayin.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein
Then blame the women who get the abortions, not the doctor performing it. Otherwise, women dying from back alley abortions will once again be common place.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein
Well the good news is PP is mostly all about helping women have safe sex and preventing unwanted pregnancies so let's all just calm down and let them do their jobs and stop with "let's defund PP" nonsense.
...
It would destabilize the progress the U.S. has made toward fewer abortions and unwanted pregnancies.
In 2010, publicly funded clinics in the U.S. averted 1.7 million unwanted pregnancies, including 374,000 teenage pregnancies, according to the Guttmacher Institute. The clinics prevented 570,000 abortions and saved taxpayers $7.6 billion. Since Planned Parenthood is a major player among publicly funded clinics, a sudden defunding could take a big chunk out of these numbers, at least temporarily.
originally posted by: blondegiraffe
there is the case from 1962 with sherri finkbine and her thalidomide deformed fetus which she did get approved to have a therapeutic abortion and when she went public to raise awareness about thalidomide there was a public outcry and her american abortion was cancelled and she had to go to sweden where they told her the baby would not have survived anyway because it was so deformed... en.m.wikipedia.org...
and also the case of gerri santoro who died from basically a back alley abortion in 1964. before it was legal.....en.m.wikipedia.org...
i really can't say that the baby's lives are monumentally more important than the mother's. and those and many other cases like them are the reason why i am pro-choice. because women DO have the choice to abort whether it's legal or not. they can take a hanger and do it if they are really desperate or take other measures that will endanger their lives too.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I wonder if anyone has any memories of being in the womb during their 12-16th weeks. I mean, these are little humans after all, shouldn't they have self-awareness enough to have some kind of memory of being in the womb?
The entire issue is because pro-birth and pro-pregnancy people believe life begins at conception. These people believe that when random DNA from two people touches inside a woman, "God" somehow zaps her uterus and endows the multiplying cells with a conscious awareness that is characteristic of a human. If this were true, we would all have memories of being in the womb. The fact is, the brains of a fetus aren't complex or developed enough to even have thoughts or make and store memories.
A fetus' brain only starts to emit electrical signals at 12 weeks, and the EGGs recorded are comparable to that of a sea slug according to the eminent neuroscience researcher Micheal Gazzaniga in his book, "The ethical brain". A fetus only develops its cerebral cortex, the part of the brain which regulates thought and consciousness at 24 weeks, well after the limit for abortions. Before 24 weeks, its brain only emits electrical signals, not brain waves which indicate thought.
The other question often asked is whether a fetus can feel pain. Till date, there has been no definite consensus but in 2010, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a scientific report, Fetal Awareness - Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice, that "Current research shows that the sensory structures are not developed or specialized enough to respond to pain in a fetus of less than 24 weeks", pg. 22. Simply put, a fetus before 24 weeks lacks the physical capacity to feel pain and that is the current generally- accepted scientific hypothesis.