It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Would it be to much to ask for realistic approaches to problem solving.
Cats have kittens in the oven but that doesn't make them biscuits.......yeahright
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: olaru12
Would it be to much to ask for realistic approaches to problem solving.
Cats have kittens in the oven but that doesn't make them biscuits.......yeahright
I don't see any other approach that will turn America around. Seeing that our political system is completely corrupt.
We cannot continue to let the powers that be chose their President for us.
You all watch in the end it will be Jeb Bush and Hillary, the same old corrupt bought and paid for puppets for the NWO and either one will carry on where Obama left off.
Then you are talking revolution, chaos, and anarchy.....then martial law and more tyranny. That's precisely why I said.....
"Realistic solutions"
There are some really good ideas in the OP.
But, if you were in a lengthy debate, would you be able to defend all of those ideas?
How would you go about getting all of that done?
As an earlier post mentioned, you would have to convince Congress to go along with you to give the ax to some VERY powerful agencies.
As to wether or not if I would vote for you?
Yes.
If I was convinced you could pull it off.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Informer1958
Why and how are you so confident that you would have the backing of the American people?
You barely have the backing of this thread.
originally posted by: Informer1958
I don't know about that, but I have your attention.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Informer1958
I don't know about that, but I have your attention.
So does Kate Upton, but I wouldn't consider voting her into office.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: olaru12
Then you are talking revolution, chaos, and anarchy.....then martial law and more tyranny. That's precisely why I said.....
"Realistic solutions"
That is your assumption. I believe it can be done without all the chaos you describe. You are the one here that is not being realistic. How about being a little positive for once and stop with the negativity.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: notmyrealname
Ron Paul had no axe to grind against corporate America, though. He had an axe to grind against politicians who gave them bailouts and handouts, but I don't ever recall him positioning himself to dictate those companies would be required to accept price controls or else lose their right to do business inside the US. I also don't believe I've ever heard Ron Paul support any form of national healthcare or healthcare nationalization plan.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
Okay, so you are trying to be Ron Paul; look how far that got him.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
I feel invisible.........
Still asking HOW lol
I could say "I will make sure everyone has 100K in their bank account"
"I will send the first manned permanent mission to mars"
"I will end poverty in the United States"
"I will give everyone a brand new car"
etc etc etc
But its all hallow with no plan.....