It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: AlaskanDad
When was the last time Mr. Sanders worked for slightly above minimum wage?
Socialism gives the plutocrats a handle on society and the economy by using the government to control all
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Sanders is a socialist. Obama is not.
The very basic principle of socialism seems to be escaping you. You're confusing socialism for progressivism and crony capitalism.
obamaism.blogspot.com... A hint: giving up your pie is code for socialist redistribution of wealth. Did you understand that?
"They don't want the whole pie," she told the women. "There are some who do, but most Americans feel blessed just being able to thrive a little bit. But that is becoming even more out of reach. If we don't wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership, for how we want this country to work, then we won't get universal health care. The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more." - Michelle Obama
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Socialism gives the plutocrats a handle on society and the economy by using the government to control all
How does socialism do that? The practice of socialism itself, much like capitalism, is at the whim of the people in power or those that take power if the society as a while does not keep them in check.
You're trying to argue that socialism's design is to allow that to happen and that is not the case. Socialism is a group of people or a society "chipping-in" to serve a common purpose or good. That applies to families, to churches and all the way up to entire systems of government. How that system is used is on their shoulders.
The same faults you have with socialism can be applied to capitalism or any other system.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Irrelevant.
Socialism is still part of the philosophy expressed in the constitution whether we want to admit it or not, and is part of our society whether we want to admit it or not.
If you don't like it, quit using the roads and police I help pay for and we will call it good.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Sanders is a socialist. Obama is not.
The very basic principle of socialism seems to be escaping you. You're confusing socialism for progressivism and crony capitalism.
Yah sure the roads are public, and maintained by the public. there is a point of crossover, but there is a difference between basic public needs and the kind of New Deal welfare and workfare food stamp free this and that
and everything else in between which came into being starting from FDR 33rd degree Mason and Democrat.
originally posted by: introvert
Socialism is still part of the philosophy expressed in the constitution whether we want to admit it or not, and is part of our society whether we want to admit it or not.
You socialists claim all human cooperation as socialist. All freedom is based on economics and all economic is based on cooperation. Socialism takes out the voluntary cooperation while all the while claiming forced behavior is freedom.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: introvert
Socialism is still part of the philosophy expressed in the constitution whether we want to admit it or not, and is part of our society whether we want to admit it or not.
But the corruption of bureaucracy is not part of the Constitution is it.
Corruption is very much part of society.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
Yah sure the roads are public, and maintained by the public. there is a point of crossover, but there is a difference between basic public needs and the kind of New Deal welfare and workfare food stamp free this and that
Basic public needs is all I'm talking about. You're taking it to the extreme.
and everything else in between which came into being starting from FDR 33rd degree Mason and Democrat.
Yup, nutbag extremes.
You're still missing the point that socialism is already at work and part of our system. Another member may call it "community" or "cross-over" but the premise is still the same.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: introvert
Socialism is still part of the philosophy expressed in the constitution whether we want to admit it or not, and is part of our society whether we want to admit it or not.
But the corruption of bureaucracy is not part of the Constitution is it.
Corruption is very much part of society.
Corruption is at the feet of Men. No system can succeed if the people involved are corrupt, be it socialism or capitalism.