It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
people will believe anything these days!
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
Snopes has a better story.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
Snopes has a better story.
No mention of Larry Nichols.
In 1988 Larry Nichols, then a marketing director for the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, was fired from his job for making hundreds of calls to the Nicaraguan contras from his office. In 1990 he filed a lawsuit against Clinton claiming the then-Governor of Arkansas and others made him the scapegoat in a misappropriation-of-funds charge that cost him his job. In that suit he also tossed in claims of extramarital affairs, naming five women Clinton was supposed to have chased across the sheets. Nichols withdrew his lawsuit in 1992 and issued a round of apologies to everyone involved. He admitted what he'd said had been an attempt to destroy the Governor by innuendo.
Read more at www.snopes.com...
Nichols has since changed his tune yet again, and has returned to making allegations against Clinton, always being careful to stop just short of asserting Clinton is involved in various murders and other crimes Nichols points to as "suspicious."
Read more at www.snopes.com...
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
I apologize for missing it.
Since his dismissal from the AFDA, Nichols has made a career of peddling anti-Clinton books and tapes to the lunatic fringe. Take anything claimed about or by this man with a huge grain of salt.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
I apologize for missing it.
You also "missed" this
Since his dismissal from the AFDA, Nichols has made a career of peddling anti-Clinton books and tapes to the lunatic fringe. Take anything claimed about or by this man with a huge grain of salt.
If surficient evidence can be gathered then yes they 100% should be procecuted and face the same penaltys as a member of the public.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Informer1958
I watched like 20 min of it, then was over it.
What do you mean there is no reason for him to make this up?
He runs a talk show, he as every reason to do so.
Again if he wants to talk about having the smoking gun of the fake moon landing that I won't put it past him to make this up.
All I am asking is how the person was vetted to be who he said he is.
Is all we need is one talk show host word and that means it must be true?