It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: turbonium1
I've never known anyone who wanted NASA to just orbit Earth over and over again, for decades, after (supposedly) landing men on the moon.
It wasn't by choice, that's for sure.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: turbonium1
What you're really saying is "I don't care what evidence you show me. I will make up some excuse so I can ignore it and my story will stay the same."
No wonder no one takes you seriously. You flip from one argument to another when you run out of ideas.
You've yet to show any proof that what you say is in any way true. We're all still waiting.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: turbonium1
What you're really saying is "I don't care what evidence you show me. I will make up some excuse so I can ignore it and my story will stay the same."
No wonder no one takes you seriously. You flip from one argument to another when you run out of ideas.
You've yet to show any proof that what you say is in any way true. We're all still waiting.
I'm still waiting for any proof it ever happened, first of all!
The films/images prove it was hoaxed, not genuine.
originally posted by: turbonium1
Show me proof they considered it to be valid data, anywhere in their reports, since you keep on claiming it is valid, genuine data....
They don't say it, since you'd have posted it long ago.
It's in the report, so it must be valid, genuine data - let's move along, folks!....
Your argument is, if data was put in their reports, it is genuine data, period.
They explain why it is not valid data, you ignore this fact, and insist on spouting this nonsense.
Pretending what you want, despite all reality...
originally posted by: turbonium1
It wasn't tested on Earth, where anyone could actually confirm that it could fly, which is odd, considering NASA is now testing developmental lunar landers on Earth, which don't work nearly as well as the LM did over 40 years ago, and
As for data, they are still gathering it today. Why would that be required if they knew it was safe 40 years ago?
originally posted by: turbonium1
I've never known anyone who wanted NASA to just orbit Earth over and over again, for decades, after (supposedly) landing men on the moon.
It wasn't by choice, that's for sure.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
You're right about that Turbo. It wasn't by choice. JFK did not give NASA a choice - he gave them orders to conduct (and win) a space race against the Russians by the end of the decade. But who really came up with that idea? Wasn't it Richard Nixon, who as Vice President, openly suggested that goal was '66-'68 for manned circumlunar and a manned landing by the early Seventies?
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
...Furthermore, are the curious attempts by NASA administrators to establish "Keep-Out Zones" over "Apollo Heritage Sites"...
I'm still waiting for any proof it ever happened, first of all!
The films/images prove it was hoaxed, not genuine.