It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: turbonium1
The magical disturbance that vanishes in close-ups, pops up to viewing at long-range??
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
The magical disturbance that vanishes in close-ups, pops up to viewing at long-range??
you mean similar to the contrast between a bootprint from a distance and close up seems to disappear??
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
It has been resolved, mostly by you being given evidence that completely dismisses your absurd and fictitious claims. There clearly isn't any point discussing this with you as you have absolutely no conceptual understanding of what is being discussed. Come back when you do.
Don't want to deal with footprints? I imagine you don't, because you can't explain how they appear in LRO images. Here's a shot from the Apollo 17 ascent footage that covers the area shown in choos' image image above, together with am LRO image and a copy of that Apollo photo that I've adjusted the contrast on so that you can see the tracks left by the astronauts.
Schmitt is setting up the SEP, which means he is at the cross at the bottom of the LRO and 16mm images. Photographs either side of that sequence show the rover tracks heading across the path from the LM. You can also the a dark area at the end of a short track from the LM.
Frames from the 16mm footage showing these features were publicly available in magazines and also in the Science Report decades before the LRO, but you won't want to discuss that either.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: turbonium1
Yet you've not shown a single thing that doesn't match up. You just ignore the posts that proves your opinion wrong.
Fear of facing the truth is your problem, not mine.
originally posted by: turbonium1
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: turbonium1
The magical disturbance that vanishes in close-ups, pops up to viewing at long-range??
you mean similar to the contrast between a bootprint from a distance and close up seems to disappear??
It's blatantly obvious that you have no answer for the non-existent 'disturbance', supposedly caused by the landing of an LM on the 'moon'.
You've shown that a real, physical feature is much more defined at close-range, than it is at a distance. Which is exactly what I've been telling you all along. Well done!
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
Surely there must be something in the T&C that prevents this repeated, deliberately abstruse and unintelligible posting?
I am going to be the first to say that it s by no means conclusive, and this JAXA image is not the best quality
originally posted by: choos
the LM disturbance visible from orbit is due to the regolith changed in a way to make it more REFLECTIVE when compared with the surrounding..
ive shown you the bootprints NOT to talk about bootprint but to compare the reflectiveness of the regolith both within the print and surrounding it.. you are the one deliberately ignoring this comparison (probably because you know that it gives you your explaination)
except that ive been explaining to you that the LM disturbance is a REFLECTIVE ISSUE.. the bootprint being more/less defined depending on viewing distance is irrelevant to my point, its the reflection of sunlight that is my point. i wonder how many more times i need to say this before you understand????