It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KesleyJ
It took intelligence to create Android, iPod, and iPad. Scientist say no intelligence created humans, a thinking life form which is much more complicated than a phone.
originally posted by: Frocharocha
The main problem with the bible standarts it's that it doesn't account the genetic variation. People probably didn't know back then, but incest can lead to abort or genetic deformation. So either adam and eve was packed with a mysterious cocktail of DNA, or i'm more inclined to believe there was more than a single human around back then.
Anyway, the reason we share the same dna with most creatures on earth can be seen on the similarities with the living beings. At a certain point, a single organism (belived to came from Sarcopterygii) survived and from them almost all living animals became tetrapods (two arms and two legs, or four legs.) The same can be applied to most fish.
originally posted by: Frocharocha
But the Bible's language is clear that Adam and Eve were real people. Their historical existence and fall into sin are foundational to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
The texts chronical the Anuna’s genetic experimentations as they engineered the first humans. The texts write about six attempts and how the first five were failures for various reasons ranging from deformities to androgynous life forms. Finally, the sixth was successful and insemination was used to produce the first humans from this humanoid creation. Ninmah was the original scientist trying to engineer humans. After her multiple failures she became frustrated and asked Enki to take over the development. Each of these genetic failures was kept alive and cared for in the manner it required. This shows the benevolent nature of these advanced beings. Writings later reference the “black headed ones” whom the Anuna ruled. This is obviously a reference to early black skinned people who were likely the first mass-procreated creations of the Anuna. The reference to their color implies the Anuna were not black (otherwise, why call out the color?). But, no other skin color is described. Some theorize this genetic development took place in what the Hebrew and Christian Bible call the Garden of Eden and that Adam and Eve were the first two creations that were used to procreate humanity. The garden may have been a biosphere where the genetically engineered humanoids would be nurtured and studied–determining what needed to be improved upon. The obvious implication is that the Genesis stories of creation are actually rooted in Sumerian history and the Annuna (Annunaki).
As for the 2nd youtube video, again bull s#. Human DNA from yesterday, 1000 years, 10,000, 20,000 or 45,000 years old is all the same. There is absolutely no hint of tampering, abrupt changes or anything else that would distinguish any of them apart genetically.
The explanations are purely 20th and 21st century fictions designed to sell books and advertising slots on History Channel's 'Ancient Aliens' series. I'm sorry if I come off overly harsh but its incredibly frustrating to see people constantly use the same "evidence" over and over and just repeat it because it sounds like it makes sense to them but can't be bothered to do any basic fact checking. Especially with "Prof. Chang". A little internet sleuthing on his name alone should have set off enough red flags to make you question the entire premise. And I won't even get started on Sitchin's hokum translations...
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: peter vlar
You sound like a 911 debunker, you believe you are an expert in Sitchin's work. I only presented a different alternative besides the Bible and many of mainstream pseudo science.
That is your "opinion" and you certainly have not disproved anything in any of the videos. Do you have proof there is no human DNA tampering, lets see it?
Again this is you "opinion" nothing more. It appears to me that you have done little to no research in Sitchin work but to ridicule it. I agree Sitchin work might have a flaw or two and is still being worked on, however it doesn't mean Sitchin deliberately lied in his translations and all his work should be ignored. You have a lot to learn my friend.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: peter vlar
You sound like a 911 debunker,
I only presented a different alternative besides the Bible and many of mainstream pseudo science.
That is your "opinion" and you certainly have not disproved anything in any of the videos.
Do you have proof there is no human DNA tampering, lets see it?
It appears to me that you have done little to no research in Sitchin work but to ridicule it.
I agree Sitchin work might have a flaw or two
and is still being worked on,
however it doesn't mean Sitchin deliberately lied in his translations and all his work should be ignored.
You have a lot to learn my friend.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: spacemanjupiter
I agree because some couple had to be the start of homo sapiens its as simple as that.
Not only do you not understand a joke, but perhaps you should refrain from labelling people idiots because you assumed what they know of the TOE & DNA/genetic coding.
It does you a disservice.
originally posted by: peter vlar
4.52 billion years of natural physiological and biochemical processes