It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
he family of 19-year-old Zachary Hammond wants a grand jury investigation into his death. According to Eric Bland, a lawyer representing the teen’s family, Hammond was shot twice in the back by a Seneca, South Carolina police officer. The officer mentioned nothing about killing the teen in a report filed the same day.
According to Seneca police chief John Covington, the unnamed police officer “feared for his life” when he shot the unarmed teenager in the parking lot of a Hardee’s restaurant on Sunday. Covington claims that Hammond drove his car directly toward the police officer, and was attempting to run him over.
There are several problems with that story. First, according to the family’s attorney, Hammond was shot twice in the back. According to Bland, who viewed photos taken by the coroner’s officer:
“It is clearly, clearly from the back. It is physically impossible for him to be trying to flee or run over the officer that shot him.”
dditionally, both bullet entry wounds are in almost the same location. The attorney told Greenville Online:
“The shots were so close in proximity to each other that it would be physically impossible unless the car was stopped and the officer came up very close to an open window. Picture a car going 20 miles an hour and I’m fortunate enough to get a shot off, and I hit you —there’s no way I can get the second shot if the car’s going 20 miles an hour.”
Covington’s own statements regarding what happened just don’t add up. Covington stated that the officer approached the teen with his gun already drawn. According to the police chief, the cop:
“had his hand on or very close to the car, possibly pushed off from the car.”
He also states that the officer shot Hammond point blank, through the open driver’s side window.
Those statements are not consistent with other statements made by Covington.
Greenville Online reports:
“The car, which was driven by the 19-year-old Seneca High School graduate, was turning toward the officer as if to run over him and the officer fired in self-defense, the chief said.”
During an interview with Fox Carolina, Covington said that the car was “speeding toward the officer.”
Even more unsettling, the officer who shot the teen never filed a report indicating that he had fired his weapon or killed someone, in self defense or otherwise. Covington appeared unconcerned, saying that the cop would file a report about it “at some point.”
That’s completely unacceptable. To realize that a cop who just killed a kid is being allowed to file a report about the shooting whenever he gets around to it is just completely unfathomable
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
a reply to: smurfy
Let me give you and your countrymen a suggestion.
Disarm your police but have specialist armed response units available.
Have a gun amnesty where all citizens can hand in their guns and get a payment for each one.
After the amnesty period anyone spotted with a gun is "dealt with" by the armed response units.
You are probably thinking this is pie in the sky thinking... but this actually happened in the UK after Dunblane.
We can make it work, why can't you?
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
You're missing the point. No-one should be justifying any shooting.
Nobody, not the citizens, not the police, should have guns.
It works here in the UK. Why can't it work in the US?
originally posted by: PraetorianAZ
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
You're missing the point. No-one should be justifying any shooting.
Nobody, not the citizens, not the police, should have guns.
It works here in the UK. Why can't it work in the US?
How can you say gun control works if you still have to have an armed response unit in the UK?
So what your saying is only criminals and certain police should have guns?
n Wednesday, Hammond’s family released the results of a private autopsy, which concluded that both bullets entered Hammond’s body from the back. According to the autopsy, the second bullet proved to be fatal, entering from the back of Hammond’s left side and passing through his chest, piercing his lungs and heart.
State Law Enforcement Division agents Friday denied a formal request by The Post and Courier to release videos from a controversial police shooting in Seneca that spawned a federal civil rights probe.
The denial under the state’s open records act comes amid new allegations from a witness who said a Seneca officer placed something underneath the body of Zachary Hammond, 19, immediately after the shooting.
More than a week after Hammond’s death, his family’s attorney says race is almost certainly playing a role in the disconcerting silence. Unlike the victims in the highest-profile police shootings over the past year — in cities from Ferguson and Cleveland to North Charleston and Cincinnati — Hammond was white.
“It’s sad, but I think the reason is, unfortunately, the media and our government officials have treated the death of an unarmed white teenager differently than they would have if this were a death of an unarmed black teen,” Bland told The Washington Post this week. “The hypocrisy that has been shown toward this is really disconcerting.”
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
a reply to: dreamingawake
Wow.. Only one reason they wont release the video... If it shows what they say happened it would allready be out.