It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: borntowatch
This is the image of the "footprint":
The "news" has been plastered all over sites with dubious reliability, such as Beforeitsnews.
Notice how the edge of what is supposed to be the foot's instep is way too edgy. A real foot has a smooth instep, whereas the footprint in the picture comes from a foot whose owner had half a foot.
Sorry - I call BS on this one.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: danielsil18
Yeah because paleontologists who are looking at something that makes their ENTIRE career and knowledge base irrelevant are always so quick to let EVERYONE know about it.
Are people really this naive?
Jaden
originally posted by: Masterjaden
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: borntowatch
This is the image of the "footprint":
The "news" has been plastered all over sites with dubious reliability, such as Beforeitsnews.
Notice how the edge of what is supposed to be the foot's instep is way too edgy. A real foot has a smooth instep, whereas the footprint in the picture comes from a foot whose owner had half a foot.
Sorry - I call BS on this one.
Actually, no, what this tells us is that the foot owner walks heel to toe and at least in this instance rotated his foot inward as he shifted from his heel to the front pad of his foot.
Jaden
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Barcs
He doesn't even believe it's real. In his mind, it's further evidence that MES and supporting mechanisms, specifically how we date artifacts and remains based on geology, is completely faulty and based on faulty, inaccurate science. It's essentially a troll thread for borntowatch to sit back and laugh while we all scramble to debunk this absolute malarkey.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: borntowatch
This is the image of the "footprint":
The "news" has been plastered all over sites with dubious reliability, such as Beforeitsnews.
Notice how the edge of what is supposed to be the foot's instep is way too edgy. A real foot has a smooth instep, whereas the footprint in the picture comes from a foot whose owner had half a foot.
Sorry - I call BS on this one.
originally posted by: MysterX
There is the possibility that it is actually a Human or Human like creatures fossilised footprint. I understand the obvious instinct to reject this out of hand, as it doesn't fit with our teaching about the history of the Human family and so if we reject that Humans or another member of our lineage were walking around 300 million years ago, we're left with science fiction and fakery to work with...fakery being the obvious choice.
The science fiction angle, is probably even harder to swallow than the 300 million year old Hominid angle.
The discovery of the 290 million year old footprint was made in New Mexico by paleontologist Jerry MacDonald in 1987. In the vicinity of this mysterious footprint there are fossilized impressions of birds and other animals.
originally posted by: Barcs
So do you have evidence to show it's real?
originally posted by: Barcs
There is no science here for me to hate.
originally posted by: Barcs
You hold evolution to such ridiculous standards of proof and deny all evidence
originally posted by: Barcs
yet believe a picture of a footprint blindly with no supporting evidence whatsoever because it reinforaces a worldview.
originally posted by: Barcs
Keep that hypocrisy coming.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: Masterjaden
You do know that birds first appeared around 150 Ma (if Archaeopteryx counts) or later, right? Saying that the footprint is dated 290 Ma "along with birds footprint" is a blatant proof of hoax.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
So let me get this straight?
You say the geological time scale is a hoax (care to elaborate?) but accept this footprint as probably true based on what evidence?
An Alleged Human Footprint on Permian Rock
originally posted by: borntowatch
You do know that according to what has been discovered bird are around 150 Ma is a guess. Its a belief, its not science.
originally posted by: borntowatchMore evidence will show up and change the timelines as per usual.
originally posted by: borntowatchassumption is not science, never has been.
Evolution theology changes weekly if not daily.
See that "Theology" because I think its a religion.