It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
None of Hillary's top donors are unions. All of Bernie's are
This is significant and telling. If you believe in following the money, the money route here leads to the conclusion that worker supported unions believe that Hillary is not on their side and Bernie is.
While Hillary Clinton has made a political career with the support of the financial sector, socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) has relied on labor. A review of campaign fundraising records conducted by the Labor Union Report found that all of Bernie Sanders’ top donors come from Big Labor, which could complicate Hillary Clinton’s tack to the left to woo union support.
I was referring to an article I read a few days ago maybe on Yahoo or some similar site. Bernie was saying that he has voted to ban certain types of "assault weapons",
Again, Good.
how he voted to close a "gunshow loophole"
which to my knowledge never existed,
en.wikipedia.org...
Gun show loophole is a U.S. political term referring to the sales of firearms to private buyers by private sellers including gun shows. Unlicensed private-party sellers are not required to ask for identification, and cannot initiate a background check without the help of a Federal Firearms Licensee in all but three states, where they may do so voluntarily.[1]
The seller is also not required to record the sale. The loophole refers to a perceived gap in the law with regard to sales or transfers of firearms between private citizens.[2]
The term may also be referred to as the Brady bill loophole, the Brady law loophole, the gun law loophole, and the private sale loophole.
and a he wanted background checks to be "stronger, more enforceable."
The language he uses says to me that he has no idea what he's talking about.
He went on to say "we need to find a common ground solution" (maybe not exact wording) but never offered what that solution may be.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Excallibacca
Yes for those that let the NRA do their voting for him, he will lose votes.
www.ontheissues.org...
His record is a little different.
"I believe that we need to make sure that certain types of guns used to kill people, exclusively, not for hunting, they should not be sold in the United States of America, and we have a huge loophole now with gun shows that should be eliminated.”
originally posted by: CynConcepts
we just had to walk around the store for under a hour and wahlah, take them home! It was crazy, and unbelievable! Admittedly, a wee bit scary too! I respect gun rights, but seriously I have to agree that there is no reason one should not wait 24 to 72 hours before impulsively buying a gun!
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Excallibacca
The gun show loophole is where you can just go to a gun show and buy a gun.
It is considered a private sale so I think it doesn't need the background checks.
That is a massive loophole.
Seen it first had, we were in Texas for some training and all the guys had to do was show their orders and their ID's and they were able to all buy pistols.
Think one of our SNCOs bought a M4 as well.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Because he's REAL.
Because he discusses REAL issues.
Because people are sick of the FAKES and their FAKE promises and FAKE concern and their transparent pandering.
I say he has a really good shot at it.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Answer
Well they bought it and had it the same day.
Are checks that fast?