It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
Heff, why doesn't PP stop the abortions and just provide the other services that aren't controversial?
If a company only derives 3% of their profit from poisoning the environment then we are supposed to say nothing?
These people need to leave abortions to someone else if they want to be free from criticism.
Your graph is irrelevant.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: IAMTAT
You know something. If you are SOOOO convinced that there is some criminality going on, then have them federally investigated. Oh but then, when nothing damning turns up, you'll probably just say that there was some conspiracy to cover it up because of the nwo or something like that right?
originally posted by: palg1
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: IAMTAT
You know something. If you are SOOOO convinced that there is some criminality going on, then have them federally investigated. Oh but then, when nothing damning turns up, you'll probably just say that there was some conspiracy to cover it up because of the nwo or something like that right?
Sounds to me like you've already made up your mind. In your words, "Oh but then, when nothing damning turns up" not ' if nothing damning turns up".
I for one would appreciate an investigation. Whether I believe that the results are skewed is my business. A thorough, in-depth investigation, with published content and conclusions, might just shed light on the truth of this matter.
Why should anyone be against a federal investigation, except in fear that the results may prove distasteful.
originally posted by: ketsuko
It wouldn't on the moral sense, but at least we wouldn't be paying for it anymore.
But Planned Parenthood cannot use the money it receives from the federal government for abortions anyway. According to the Department of Health and Human Service’s website, "by law, Title X funds may not be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning." Medicaid funding is restricted by the Hyde Amendment to only abortion cases involving rape, incest or endangerment to the life of the mother.
...
The federal budget deal now bans Washington, D.C., from using its funds to pay for abortions.
originally posted by: Iamthatbish
If birth control and the abortion pill were available over the counter a woman wouldn't need a place like PP. Until these steps are accomplished we do still need places like PP.
Simply defunding this nonprofit does nothing to help the people that rely on this company specifically for their sexual health.
Finally, Fox's investigation of Planned Parenthood's revenue and the American taxpayer's contribution to that revenue provides no useful context for the viewer. In 2014, the federal government spent nearly 900 times more than Planned Parenthood collected from all government sources in 10 years; the $4.3 billion price tag Fox highlighted represents a miniscule portion of total government spending over the same period. Likewise, the 10-year burden shouldered by Fox's "average taxpayer" represents a tiny fraction of their total income over that period. According to Fox News, a taxpayer with earnings in excess of $2.5 million over a decade would contribute only about $40 annually. Meanwhile, the average taxpayer, with a median household income of roughly $52,000 per year, would contribute only about $1.50 per year to Planned Parenthood, according to Fox's own calculations.
But Planned Parenthood cannot use the money it receives from the federal government for abortions anyway. According to the Department of Health and Human Service’s website, "by law, Title X funds may not be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning." Medicaid funding is restricted by the Hyde Amendment to only abortion cases involving rape, incest or endangerment to the life of the mother.
...
The federal budget deal now bans Washington, D.C., from using its funds to pay for abortions.
originally posted by: Iamthatbish
If birth control and the abortion pill were available over the counter a woman wouldn't need a place like PP. Until these steps are accomplished we do still need places like PP. Simply defunding this nonprofit does nothing to help the people that rely on this company specifically for their sexual health.