It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
This post contains no substance either. You haven't given a rebuttal to the information I presented.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
This post contains no substance either. You haven't given a rebuttal to the information I presented.
Yes I did.
The only reason that there is that page is because they were annoyed that they got exposed for the cult they really are.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
Of course not.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
This post contains no substance either. You haven't given a rebuttal to the information I presented.
Yes I did.
The only reason that there is that page is because they were annoyed that they got exposed for the cult they really are.
That isn't a rebuttal. You haven't demonstrated how any of the information presented is false, and if it's true then the documentary Going Clear is false propaganda.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
Of course not.
Of course they did. It's all about brain-washing and money-grabbing.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
This post contains no substance either. You haven't given a rebuttal to the information I presented.
Yes I did.
The only reason that there is that page is because they were annoyed that they got exposed for the cult they really are.
That isn't a rebuttal. You haven't demonstrated how any of the information presented is false, and if it's true then the documentary Going Clear is false propaganda.
According to the cult that got exposed by it.
Kind of ironic, don't you think?
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
Of course not.
Of course they did. It's all about brain-washing and money-grabbing.
And what evidence do you have that they've ever practiced force indoctrination?
The Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) was created in January 1974 as a system of work camps set up by the Sea Org, intended to isolate and rehabilitate members who have not lived up to the church's expectations, have failed security checks, or have violated certain policies. Melton writes that the RPF areas are located within Sea Org facilities, and that there are no locks on the doors.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
a reply to: flice
www.freedommag.org...
Of course you would use the Scientology cults own propaganda to dismiss the truth.
I'm sorry but this post contains no substance. Did you examine all of it? And if so what is your rebuttal to it?
That the Scientology cult got annoyed for being exposed. Nothing more. They just grumpy rich people who can't handle the truth about their own cult.
This post contains no substance either. You haven't given a rebuttal to the information I presented.
Yes I did.
The only reason that there is that page is because they were annoyed that they got exposed for the cult they really are.
That isn't a rebuttal. You haven't demonstrated how any of the information presented is false, and if it's true then the documentary Going Clear is false propaganda.
According to the cult that got exposed by it.
Kind of ironic, don't you think?
Ironic that an organization being falsely slandered would want to set the record straight?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
Of course not.
Of course they did. It's all about brain-washing and money-grabbing.
And what evidence do you have that they've ever practiced force indoctrination?
Wiki about the cults sea org
The Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) was created in January 1974 as a system of work camps set up by the Sea Org, intended to isolate and rehabilitate members who have not lived up to the church's expectations, have failed security checks, or have violated certain policies. Melton writes that the RPF areas are located within Sea Org facilities, and that there are no locks on the doors.
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Thetan
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TerryDon79
The SeaOrg part is spectacular. Let me know when you get to it.
I just googled it.
Why would a "peaceful religion" need a private naval force? Doesn't sound peaceful to me.
Research purposes. The fleet wasn't militarized.
Yes it was. It's a paramilitary.
It's a fact that it was strictly for research purposes and was not weaponized.
And I guess they didn't do forced indoctrination either.
Of course not.
Of course they did. It's all about brain-washing and money-grabbing.
And what evidence do you have that they've ever practiced force indoctrination?
Wiki about the cults sea org
The Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) was created in January 1974 as a system of work camps set up by the Sea Org, intended to isolate and rehabilitate members who have not lived up to the church's expectations, have failed security checks, or have violated certain policies. Melton writes that the RPF areas are located within Sea Org facilities, and that there are no locks on the doors.
Your evidence is a wiki page?