It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Some examples of video footage which includes audio can be found and this audio does include evidence of explosions, though it is not generally obvious for a number of reasons. Sounds of intense volume recorded at close distances will tend to overload and be distorted by the time they make it onto tape.
To sum it up, based on those facts, you have zero evidence for demo explosives at ground zero.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb
If you can't wait, then why am I waiting for you to post the time lines and seismic data?
Alright, loud noises were heard that could be explosions or could be the sounds of structural collapse. Did the collapse happen immediately after the sounds? If yes, the sounds could be demolition or could be collapse sounds. Do the people on the ground know the difference between a the sounds of high brisant demolition charges and other sounds? Did it sound like the many videos of building demolition with a series of sharp cracks? No. Maybe it was just one or two bigger charges. Because we can't determine what it was, we have to look for additional evidence of explosives. If we find it, then it shows demolition. If we don't find any, then we can say we have no evidence for demolition and cannot claim such. Of course, not finding evidence still allows all those who yearn for a complicated plot with secret NWO organizations involved to claim coverup or somesuch. There is no way to satisfy all who claim explosives because, even with another investigation, it can be claimed that the evidence was missed or the panel wasn't independent or, once again, there was a coverup.
originally posted by: drommelsboef
a reply to: skyeagle409
On the one hand you refuse to believe there were explosions at wtc7 because you have not enough video evidence. You, as I explained before in some detail, compare the Landmark tower with some soundless, altered, modified or cropped videos. On the other hand if there is witness information about explosions then you refuse to conclude they might be the result of explosives. What was the English phrase, walks like a duck, looks like a duck ?
I'm sure that if this guy had his camera on 15 seconds before the global collapse, you would hear the same 8 demolition sounds like in the Ashleigh Banfield video. Proof ? No not directly, but it is a simple matter of connecting the dots.
The guy should be traced back.
ps. here is the original video source that I uploaded 8 years ago, for who wants to check it, get it, I didn't modify anything
What we have to say is that in the absence of evidence of explosives, we have to conclude that the building fell due to uncontrolled fires.
Any answer from the Lee Group yet?
On the one hand you refuse to believe there were explosions at wtc7 because you have not enough video evidence.
You, as I explained before in some detail, compare the Landmark tower with some soundless, altered, modified or cropped videos.
On the other hand if there is witness information about explosions then you refuse to conclude they might be the result of explosives. What was the English phrase, walks like a duck, looks like a duck ?
We have plenty of eyewitness who were in the WTC while there were explosions going off before the WTC came down.
Why were there explosions in the basements of the WTC, no plane hit the lower levels Why did the lobbies explode in the WTC. The explosions were so powerful in the lobbies that people were blasted across the lobby.
The Elevator Man's Tale
We heard the explosion and within a matter of seconds after that impact, I heard – and as well as everybody else heard – this noise, this increasing sound of wind. And it was getting louder and louder. It was like a bomb, not quite the sound of a bomb coming down from a bomber. It was a sound of wind increasing, a whistling sound, increasing in sound.
What we heard was 6 and 7 car free-falling from the 107th floor and they impacted the basement at B-2 Level. And that’s the explosion that filled the lobby within a matter of two or three seconds, engulfed the lobby in dust, smoke.
Explosions in New York city before or after 911 has nothing to do with the demolitions of the WTC.
LOL Ok the elevators stop and blew up in the lobby then they went to the basement then blew up, is that the nonsense you are trying to push.
The Elevator Man's Tale
Featuring the unabridged transcript and audio.
Occupation: Elevator mechanic for Ace Elevator in the World Trade Center
Was in the south tower when the first plane hit
You ignoring all the eyewitness accounts proves my case.