It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flesh699
Lol WTC 7 was two blocks away from the towers.
originally posted by: Flesh699
NO other buildings collapsed from "falling debris" besides that one.
originally posted by: Flesh699
For MASSIVE amount of debris falling, I don't understand the magic of it skipping two city blocks and magically drilling WTC 7 at a perfect point to make it collapse.
originally posted by: Flesh699
The real world doesn't work that way. There's very good reason when any news special speaks of 9/11 they DO NOT bring up Tower 7, at all. It defies common sense, and flies in the face of anyone with a brain between the eyeballs.
originally posted by: Salander
Yet you believe, among other things I'm sure, that there was a crashed airliner at the pentagon and in PA
originally posted by: Salander
that there was no molten metal at WTC
originally posted by: Salander
and that the damage observed was caused by office fires and gravity.
originally posted by: Salander
Gullible much?
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Flesh699
Lol WTC 7 was two blocks away from the towers.
Factually wrong.
WTC7 was one building away from WTC1.
originally posted by: yuppa
actually wt7 was a controlled demo after the firemen left the building. Remember the phrase"pull it"? They were telling them pull the fire support out to allow for the demo by blowing the main supports.
You, on the other hand, believe a fanciful tale of what happened because you distrust those telling you. That's it, that's all, even in the face of all the actual evidence, and even when you can offer absolutely no scientific information to support your claim and discredit the science already offered to support what actually happened, you will actively believe the most unlikely theories, instead of the proven events - because you have "suspicions".
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: yuppa
actually wt7 was a controlled demo after the firemen left the building. Remember the phrase"pull it"? They were telling them pull the fire support out to allow for the demo by blowing the main supports.
Are you actually going to offer any evidence for this belief, or just state your conspiracy theory as being entirely true and expect all to just accept it?
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: Rocker2013
This cat?
It must be true!
originally posted by: In4ormant
It was the stealth drone cats
originally posted by: In4ormant
They have be militarized!!! Haliburton!!! FEMA! PTA!
Someone PLEASE start the flying cat conspiracy thread. I'm just too lazy. We can make all kinds of connections
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Rocker2013
So who should I believe....you or these guys?
patriotsquestion911.com...
What are your credentials?
More than 1,400 engineers and architects have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11.
The AIA itself, however, is firm about its relationship with Gage. “We don’t have any relationship with his organization whatsoever,” Scott Frank, head of media relations for the AIA, told me.
originally posted by: liveandlearn
I remember hearing a longer version of Sliverstein speaking about this many years ago.
Pull it implies there are already mechanisms in place to collapse the building. Question is did the fire chief know or did Silverstein just word it that way cause it seemed to me it was his (silverstein's) suggestion
you tube
Apologies, tried to embed but has been a few years and guess things have changed.
originally posted by: yuppa
HAve you seen a controlled demo? I assume yes.
originally posted by: yuppa
Have you seen one with just the supports blew out alone? It looks a little different and its rougher.
originally posted by: yuppa
Wt7's supports were already compromised and it didnt take much to bring it down.
originally posted by: yuppa
There was a audio recording of the men in charge saying "pull it" referring to the firemen trying to save the building. You can google this yourself.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: mymojo
Im a civil engineer, and havr a PE in New York.
Yes, WTC 7 came down by controlled demolition, and the towers came down by advanced nuclear weaponry..
Please google RICH SHERIDAN APFN 911
Thanks.
If you're a civil engineer and you believe that was a controlled demolition, then you need to be fired and replaced with someone who understands SCIENCE.
Just like all those "architects" who fail to understand the weakening point of steel, or the method of construction used in the towers, or the time line of the collapse of WT7 - they should all be fired too because such a ridiculous belief and refusal to accept reality calls into question their competence in their field.
But, I don't believe for one moment that you are actually a civil engineer.