These are 5 common ways disinformation agents try to discredit a person or organization. When TPlutocratsTB need to turn the general population
against a targeted group,person or organization.
1)Divisive character attacks.
When they can't have a legit logical argument with the target in a way that they know they will win they resort
to shallow "negative or nasty" character attacks. They will call you names calling into question your mental competency(nutter,conspiracy
nut,crazies,tin foil etc.).They will call you a racist or a race sellout or a race pimp to try and get people of the opposite race to go against you
or members of the same race to go against you. They will call you a homophobe or a sexist and intolerant to LGBT. They will call you a religious
fundementalists and intolerant. Remember at this point facts/logics/evidence/witnesses doesn't matter. Its just negative framing now. This attack is
designed to disqualify anything you say/do/write to the group they are negative framing you against.
2)Moles,Saboteurs and Provocateurs
-Infiltrate group or organization with a mole. Spy on them and find negative information about them and
blackmail them or bribe more members. The group/organization is slowly more and more compromised until its under total control of the outside party.
Relaying information so they are always 2-3 steps ahead of the group or have a canned counter response ready for them beforehand. Saboteurs can be
used to slow down,misdirect,misinform,incriminate, the organization,group,person with red herrings and wild goose chases or cul-de-sac strategies.
Saboteurs also act as the inside man(or woman) for destroying vital infrastructure/information/processes of the group,organization, or person.
Provocateurs are used provoke the members of the organization into doing harmful,illegal,violent,immoral,unethical acts. Employers of the provocateurs
can then spin to the media that the members are [insert negative nasty smear] and show a provocateur with other members they manipulated doing
something bad to "prove" their accusations.
- This is really common nowadays. They group or organization executing this disinformation tactic uses agitation propaganda to
frame a group. Example: Racist people hate people of other races. Non racist people are annoyed by racists and hate them and will go against anything
they do/say to prove they are not racist(a subconscious rubber-banding effect) Agitate the racists with anti-their race propaganda while promoting
other races.Selectively report racists that have guns and saying racists things in public.They become agitated and resort to low level terrorist and
acts of violence to maintain normalcy in their mind(racist person: See your not so powerful I hurt/killed/etc the other race...so I am still powerful
yay). Edit and broadcast this to the masses. Use this to demonize/discredit gun ownership(by association) and demonize personal expression(racism is
personal expression like it or not its protected under the US constitution) and legitimize the 1st amendment. Use them to de-legitimatize the US
constitution and bill of right and the individual and legitimize authoritarian collectivism instead. Repeat the process until all rights are state
sanctioned privileges that have to be licensed by a state board. Now the public will associate gun ownership,the constitution and free speech with
racism,ignorance and bigotry. Score the touchdown!
4)Editing dirty tricks
. Edit what you say or written out of context to make it sound like what you want them to sound like. Or only present
gaffs/incorrect information and ignore all of the good information to make it look like they are always wrong or inaccurate and willfully misleading
the public. Edit your message so only the weaker parts are presented while the stronger ones are omitted. Edit the content to show only negative/nasty
and no positive/pleasant content(see this a lot on the corporate news cycle). Edit to only let a small amounts of the content to be presented of the
opposing point while showing a lot more of your side of the argument.
5)Trend setting,delphi,artificial consensus,automated sock puppets
. This tactic is used on the internet often. The disinformation agent hires a
firm to create automated bots to post/reply/bump threads on message boards,blogs,twitter,fb,online polls etc to achieve a fake consensus on a subject.
They can be used to set a trend that goes against you(ie the bots put out that you are a vatican shill/"zionist shill"/fake/trying a sell a book or
"only in it for money") This can create a fake consensus that is designed to distort the image of the organization, group or person.
The bots can also suppress positive/pleasant posts/threads/replies.
edit on 25-7-2015 by John_Rodger_Cornman because: added content