It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sweden will face military “consequences” if it decides to abandon its trademark neutrality and join the NATO alliance, Russian Ambassador Viktor Tatarintsev reportedly told a Swedish newspaper Thursday. Sweden has expressed growing concern in recent months amid a noticeable uptick in Russian military activity, both in Eastern Europe and in the waters off Sweden’s coast.
Russia’s annexation of Crimea last year and purported involvement in the eastern Ukraine conflict has led to calls in Sweden for increased cooperation with NATO. Tatarintsev told Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter that Russia does not pose a threat to Sweden’s security and accused Swedish media outlets of an “aggressive propaganda campaign” against the Kremlin, according to a translation by the Local. But the ambassador warned that the country’s entrance into NATO would provoke a military response.
“I don’t think it will become relevant in the near future, even though there has been a certain swing in public opinion. But if it happens there will be counter measures. Putin pointed out that there will be consequences, that Russia will have to resort to a response of a military kind and reorientate our troops and missiles. The country that joins NATO needs to be aware of the risks it is exposing itself to,” Tatarintsev told Dagens Nyheter. However, such a response would not take the immediate form of an attack, since "Sweden is not a target for our armed troops," Tatarintsev added.
Swedish officials have repeatedly accused Russian planes of threatening the country’s airspace, and several eastern European nations, including Sweden and Latvia, have suspected Russian submarines have entered their sovereign waters. Sweden’s military dispatched fighter jets in May to ward off Russian bombers that approached Swedish territory, Reuters reports.
Putin pointed out that there will be consequences, that Russia will have to resort to a response of a military kind and reorientate our troops and missiles.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Xcathdra
Putin has diarrhea of the mouth. He needs to settle his rhetoric. Someone needs to tell him the Soviet Union no longer exists and it's about time he gets over it.
Unfortunately, Putin wants to reverse history and restore the USSR to its full former glory (plus some).
originally posted by: victor7
a reply to: Xcathdra
In the event NATO fights with Russia, these little poodles will be the ones taking the most severe beating. Their stupid leaders should look at the "real issues and reasons" of various geopolitical points and then only decide.
Historically, Russia does not attack others but reacts to the aggression.
Russia has about 16th the population of NATO, and considerably less GDP and industry - this is not WW1 or WW2 when Russia had the massive population.
originally posted by: victor7
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
Russia has about 16th the population of NATO, and considerably less GDP and industry - this is not WW1 or WW2 when Russia had the massive population.
Russia also has allies which can help account for manpower and economic weight. Russia's allies know that if the RusLand is busted, then they will be the next on the chopping block.
Foolish west needs to spend resources in finding out the Jihadist killers within its populations rather then overbudgeting the "cookie handouts" in the foreign lands.
originally posted by: Sunwolf
My response to the Russian Ambassador would be a straight right to the nose!
originally posted by: Azureblue
Have they they lent on or threatened by somebody with enormous financial and economic weapons power by somebody and if so who might that be? Doesn't sound like it would Russia to me.
originally posted by: Azureblue
Smells like somebody is threatening them with a Grease like future if they don't Join NATO, to me