It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“(c) Prohibitions against mandatory labeling of food developed using bioengineering.—Except for claims under subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1) of section 425, no State or political subdivision of a State may directly or indirectly establish under any authority or continue in effect as to any food in interstate commerce any requirement for the labeling of a food by virtue of its having been developed using bioengineering, including any requirements for claims that a food is or contains an ingredient that was developed using bioengineering.”.
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: seeker1963
I hate how lawmakers sneak things like this into bills... especially something like this, that keeps states from labelling things as GMO. If there is nothing to hide, what difference does it make if a company's products are labelled as GMO products?
originally posted by: Tardacus
If GMO isn`t bad for you then why would they care if it was labeled as GMO?
This seems like an admission that GMO is bad and labeling it as such would cause a lose of sales.