47 pictures showing strange man-shaped figure on the moon

a reply to: Spacespider

No you are wrong, they are different

Only when you look at them on Google Moon. Which distorts the hell out of lots of things.

If you look at the original scans, they are exactly the same and appear in exactly the same pixel location of the image.

originally posted by: Phage
Then there's this. Where'd he go?

NASA got some great graphic editors, no ?

Or it could explain movement..

Do I see prints ?

a reply to: Spacespider

The scans come from Arizona State University, not NASA.

Why remove something from one image and not others?
Why does the "entity" appear in exactly the same pixel location in each of the original scans?
Why is the "shadow" not affected by the direction of the Sun?

It's because it is not something on the Moon.

Subsequent analysis during image reprocessing has revealed that during the missions foreign debris are present in the optical path of the camera system and can be seen in the seen in the photographic exposures. Selected examples of blemish features of this type are shown in Figure 2. A movie showing blemish movement can be seen here. While the image processing steps undertaken as part of this effort might remove some of these blemish features, users should be aware that blemish features exist and take appropriate precautions.

apollo.sese.asu.edu...

As my last thread about abnormalities in space it gets buried quickly on ATS

Perhaps the debunkers are right, I really hope they are.

Perhaps its the things out of norm that are the hardest to believe and the easiest to dismiss
And my fear is that when the real deal is served, we will blindly ignore it.

Perhaps its the hoaxes fault, perhaps they have us all live in a world of disbelief.

a reply to: Spacespider

And my fear is that when the real deal is served, we will blindly ignore it.

You think that actually researching an "anomaly" is blindly ignoring it?
Better to blindly accept the claims of a youtuber?

a reply to: Spacespider

Perhaps its the hoaxes fault, perhaps they have us all live in a world of disbelief.

Better to hide the truth. Not of walking men on moon, either.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheMadTitan

There is no shadow.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Must of missed that post :/ Cheers

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy
I like this one.

That's the one, they called it the Jellyfish, that's what should be at my link,
And, what's going on with that second gif? It looks like a guy is getting run over by by an invisible Krill beside the crater on the right! Stretchmarks.

Burger it I found the movie on youtube complete with the frame numbers!! get the frames and you can make your own movie.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Spacespider

And my fear is that when the real deal is served, we will blindly ignore it.

You think that actually researching an "anomaly" is blindly ignoring it?
Better to blindly accept the claims of a youtuber?

Not at all...
I am just sharing a unknown that falls in my liking.

The thing I dislike the most on these forums, are the idea of black and white mindsets.
Either you believe or you don't and you have to decide instantly.

I would love if everyone would look at each subject with a fresh mindset

a reply to: smurfy
You mean the grid mark etched onto the reseau plate of the camera?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5aebfc6a8e17.gif[/atsimg]

a reply to: Spacespider

I would love if everyone would look at each subject with a fresh mindset

Does that include avoiding kneejerk claims of skullduggery by NASA? Does that include actually doing some research instead of believing the claims of a youtuber?

But, as has been pointed out, this is hardly a new subject.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Spacespider

I would love if everyone would look at each subject with a fresh mindset

Does that include avoiding kneejerk claims of skullduggery by NASA? Does that include actually doing some research instead of believing the claims of a youtuber?

But, as has been pointed out, this is hardly a new subject.

Just for enlightenment..
I don't believe in my thread... yet
Your gifs, unrelated jellyfish and your opinion have not convinced me
Waiting for the ATS experts to come with a explanation.

a reply to: Spacespider

I don't believe in my thread... yet

You seem pretty convinced that there is a shadow.
Why does the "shadow" ignore the direction of sunlight?

You seem pretty convinced there is an object on the Moon. Why does it appear in the same pixel location of every image? Why does it not appear in the same location on the Moon in different images taken seconds apart?

originally posted by: Spacespider

Waiting for the ATS experts to come with a explanation.

When it comes to debunking BS, Phage is one of those ATS experts you're waiting for.

a reply to: Phage

Phage nailed it. The odds of the anomaly randomly appearing in the exact same pixel location in each image are greater than the odds of numbers of people strolling around on the surface of the moon.

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy
I like this one.

I can agree alongside with all you debunkers thats dirt on the lens...
But I feel that "walking man" is different.

Try zooming in on and add contrast and light, and you will see legs, arms and torso.. annddd shadow.

You're taking it too far, 'walking man' is foreign debris inside the camera system, like the jelly fish...come to think of it he wouldn't be walking either, he'd be doing a bionic man run. There's other stuff too in some pictures, static builds up in the camera process, and there are pictures that show the discharge. It's explained in the link that Phage gave, and shows the camera gubbins. Mine should have been the same, but it is a direct link to the MP4 movie instead. up:

Oh there's Arken.

Always wondered where he went I miss his threads.

Someone needs to start a new thread "Arken spotted on the Moon".

originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: TheMadTitan

Was waiting for the HOAX card to be played. * sigh *

G,day mate.
so was i.
so, figure i will go with
Its The Stig

a reply to: Phage
You seem pretty convinced that there is a shadow.
Why does the "shadow" ignore the direction of sunlight?

undoubtedly they are Interdimensional, if you had done the research you would know that....

a reply to: Spacespider

Thanks for standing your ground against the usual suspects.



Can no one see the tracks to the right of the object having disappeared as well? I actually knew one of the guys that spent his days airbrushing this stuff. And airbrushed it is for my money!