It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: TrueBrit
No I know which is the point im making.
The F-35 certainly has its uses. But our RAF has been slashed and cut and its possible the F-35 will be the ONLY fighter in the RAF by 2030.
No you would not send a destroyer to do the job of a rib boat but if you politicians have gone full retard and sold all the rib boats off and refused to build new ones then you would.
The F-35 is a capable fighter Im NOT denying that. My worry is can a RAF of only F-35 and a few Euro fighters be viable? Should the UK not be planning to replace the Typhoon with a F-22 analogue to complement the F-35?
originally posted by: crazyewok
An extraordinary defence of the troubled F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has been issued by the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin, the lead company building the jet.
MSN news
Ok a certian mod and friend will jump on here and rightful claim there are missions the F-35 can do that no other fighter can and its has lots of roles. I wont argue that and for the USA that's a perfectly fine defense.
Because the USA has a fleet of F-22 and F-16 that can cover the F-35.
Thing is for the UK we are not so lucky. We are replacing most our (now pitiful) air force with these F-35 and Im sure it will have these uses. But surely its a huge problem and oversight that we don't have a F-22 equivalent? If SHTF do we really want to have to rely on the USA to do the dog fighting for us ?
To me it sees the MOD has spent billions on a plane we cant use until someone else has cleared the skies for us.
No, the F-35 was not beaten by an F-16
Now that’s out of the way we can begin, the accusations of the F-35 being inferior may seem shocking at first but it should be noted that the specific F-35 involved was ‘AF-2′, this airframe is designed for flight testing, it’s designed to fly in certain restricted flight envelopes. It does not feature the majority of systems present in frontline aircraft. The aircraft, due to it being a test aircraft, had also not had the software installed that is required to use the sensors and mission systems that would be used in combat. Additionally, ‘AF-2′ does not feature the radar-absorbent material coating that operational aircraft have.
Articles making the claim that the F-16 is superior cite tests performed earlier in the year to assess the flying qualities of the F-35 during within visual range combat and the F-16 involved was used as a visual reference to maneuver against. The aim of the test was to demonstrate the ability of the F-35 to fly to the edge of its restricted test limits without exceeding them. The test scenario was apparently successful as it allowed the aircraft be cleared for greater agility in future tests.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Tornado will be the first to go I think. But the that is a role the F-35 will do far better at.
Typhoons I think will be sticking around to 2030. By that point there airframes go beyond there intended age.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Tornado will be the first to go I think. But the that is a role the F-35 will do far better at.
Typhoons I think will be sticking around to 2030. By that point there airframes go beyond there intended age.
really? 30 years or so is their intended age? havent they been flying the f15s for over 40?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: 3danimator2014
And they're having huge problems with some of them.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Tornado will be the first to go I think. But the that is a role the F-35 will do far better at.
Typhoons I think will be sticking around to 2030. By that point there airframes go beyond there intended age.
really? 30 years or so is their intended age? havent they been flying the f15s for over 40?
The airframes are under alot of stress due to heavy overuse apparently.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
As I have stated I dont think the F-35 is a POS. I think it will be very capable for what its meant to do.
My issue is unlike the USA which will have numerous fighters to call on the RAF will have just two and possibly at some point only the F-35. Is that a good situation for the UK to be in?
Should we be looking now at a replacement program for the Euro fighter ?
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Typhoons I think will be sticking around to 2030. By that point there airframes go beyond there intended age.
originally posted by: sammamishman
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Typhoons I think will be sticking around to 2030. By that point there airframes go beyond there intended age.
Don't worry, the 6th Gens. jets are coming. We need them even worse than you guys do with the age of the F-15 fleet. They are expected to come into service 2025-2030 range.
originally posted by: StratosFear
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Structural fatigue of the wing spar and other critical supporting areas, some of the Eagles just fall out of the sky they are so worn out. There was also a thread posted not long ago about major corrosion issues with the F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.