It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pl3bscheese
a reply to: noonebutme
Healthy diets, sanitary conditions, and acclimation.
Let the weak perish, it strengthens the herd.
Giving everyone an award for participation only weakens the sport.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: Pardon?
Go look them up. This stuff is all over online, and I flat don't have time to hunt it all down and post it for you. What makes your personal review any more valid than that of anyone else?
I have done thanks.
And none of them show an association which stands up to real scrutiny.
That's why I asked if you could provide some that do as you're so convinced.
And like I said, I'll look at them from a scientific perspective, it won't be my "personal review".
Well, plenty of people, myself included, have looked at that data fro a scientific perspective, come to a different conclusion from yours.
Your definition of plenty would be very few then.
And your definition of "scientific perspective" would be different too.
And why do you choose to believe those studies and not the ones which aside from being more robust scientifically, don't agree with your beliefs?
(If you hadn't guessed, that was a rhetorical question).
Why do you choose to accept some studies, and not others? Your claim that some are "more robust" scientifically is not scientific. Everyone knows that there are as many political considerations in "peer review" as actual scientific ones.