It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you’re like two-thirds of Americans, fluoride is added to your tap water for the purpose of reducing cavities. But the scientific rationale for putting it there may be outdated, and no longer as clear-cut as was once thought.
-OP Source
“The sad story is that very little has been done in recent years to ensure that fluoridation is still needed [or] to ensure that adverse effects do not happen,” says Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an environmental health researcher and physician at Harvard University.
Data suggest that the introduction of water fluoridation resulted in a 35% reduction in decayed, missing or filled baby teeth and a 26% reduction in decayed, missing or filled permanent teeth. It also increased the percentage of children with no decay by 15%. Although these results indicate that water fluoridation is effective at reducing levels of tooth decay in children's baby and permanent teeth, the applicability of the results to current lifestyles is unclear because the majority of the studies were conducted before fluoride toothpastes and the other preventative meaures were widely used in many communities around the world.
There was insufficient information available to find out whether the introduction of a water fluoridation programme changed existing differences in tooth decay across socioeconomic groups.
There was insufficient information available to understand the effect of stopping water fluoridation programmes on tooth decay.
No studies met the review’s inclusion criteria that investigated the effectiveness of water fluoridation for preventing tooth decay in adults, rather than children.
originally posted by: introvert
Whether fluoride is bad for you or not is irrelevant in the end. In a free society, we should have the freedom to decide what we put in to our bodies. If we wish to ingest fluoride for any benefits it may have, that is our choice.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: dreamingawake
Well, yeah.
It is only good as a topical agent only. Ingesting it is not exactly good for you.
But, they had nothing to do with the toxic waste of aluminum production so, a few "tobacco'ish" studies saying how good it is and Bingo, instead of paying to dispose of toxic waste, they now get paid for the toxic waste to dump in the water supply.
Want to know what is funny, we are now IMPORTING China's toxic waste to dump in the water because we don't produce enough toxic waste to keep up the supply needed.
originally posted by: Gothmog
Fluoride was first developed in military labs for mind control purposes.
originally posted by: superman2012
originally posted by: Gothmog
Fluoride was first developed in military labs for mind control purposes.
Another lie. Another drop in the fear bucket. If I'm wrong, prove it.
originally posted by: S3QU3NC3
a reply to: reldra
I believe Toms toothpaste is owned by Colgate or at least like 85% of the company. Colgate has a patent on "tricolsan", and when mixed with chlorinated water (which most city water is treated!) makes chloroform! Watch out for most named branded products. I buy my toothpaste from a local nutrition store.
The term “dioxins” is used to represent polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). There are 210 different congeners of dioxins (75 PCDDs and 135 PCDFs); however, only 17 congeners are considered to be of toxicological concern (listed in Table 34). For these 17 congeners, evidence is sufficient to conclude that a common mechanism of action, involving binding of the chemicals to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) as the initial step, underlies 2,3,7,8-TCDD-like toxicity elicited by these PCDDs, PCDFs, and Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Van den Berg et al., 1998, 2006; Hahn, 2002).
Another possible source of toxicity from the use of triclosan is the presence of dioxins from interaction with chlorinated water. Dioxin congeners that form from triclosanare 2,7-dibenzodichloro-p-dioxin, 2,8-dichloro-p-dioxin, 1,2,8- and 2,3,7- trichlorodioxins and 1,2,3,8-tetrachlorodioxin in natural waters. These congeners are not among the 17 (listed below) that are of toxicological concern for mammals, birds, and fish.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: superman2012
originally posted by: Gothmog
Fluoride was first developed in military labs for mind control purposes.
Another lie. Another drop in the fear bucket. If I'm wrong, prove it.
Is everything that does not fit your beliefs a lie or attempt at fear ?