It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where in the constitution does the state have power to determine who has the right to marry, and who doesn't?
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Where in the constitution is the federal government given power over marriage rites?
Which amendment guarantees any two people the right to marry?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Actually, progressives say you can have any opinion you want, but religious opinion can't be law.
I love this myth that Progressives want to take away your 1st amendment rights.
Do some progressives want to make "hate speech" illegal? You bet! Those are the radical left that make the moderate left look bad. Just as the radical right make the moderate right look bad.
I find it troubling that the gov is involved at all
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: wasaka
I actually made a comparison about the assault on democracy and a selective usage of our rights . I was ganged up on by 3 to 4 posters telling me my stance was illrelevant .
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: JBRiddle
You nailed it. Regardless of stance on gay marriage, everyone who values freedom should find this troubling. Looks like celebration will drown out any rational concern, though.
Do you recognize the hypocrisy and irony in what you posted?
So everyone who values freedom should find it troubling that we are allowing people to have their freedoms?
Everyone who values to keep the gov out of things like marriage should be concerned.......
I find it troubling that the gov is involved at all
Theatrics is precisely what Scalia penned in that missive. He was unhappy about the decision, and wrote a flowery story about how we're slowly eroding the balance of America because there weren't enough conservative white people on the benches in the Supreme Court.
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: introvert
Let's try to stay on topic. Not much room for theatrics in a thread about written law. Oversimplification won't do any good either.
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: introvert
Let's try to stay on topic. Not much room for theatrics in a thread about written law. Oversimplification won't do any good either.
Actually, The government should protect the rights of ALL people. I don't agree with your stance, but I think you should protected under the constitution to speak that stance.
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: introvert
But the federal government should only protect the rights of people you agree with, right?