It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
Now it depends on if they are in primary school or secondary school.
In primary it is just science class with a bit of everything in and at secondary it gets split into biology physics chemistry etc.
Oh and what has people shooting smack to do with the subject are you being obtuse on purpose?.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: NavyDoc
Hey, My bad!!
Must have gotten mixed up in the thread responses. Please forgive me and if we ever shall meet, I'll be happy to share some nice 21Yr + single-malt to show that I mean it.
You are on.
I've got a bottle of LochDhu I've been holding on to. It'll make a man of yea.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
Of course the time saved going on about creation is going to be used in a science class if that is where it was taught before.
Like I said it will be science class for primary pupils and biology for secondary students.
Creationism isn't gone at all it is just taught in the re lessons.
I just think you do not understand our schooling system because if you did uou would understand the very simple concept of less creationist teachings on a science class equals more time to teach science.
Make a thread if you want to bleat on about the problems all schools have but it is off topic and you know so.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: NavyDoc
Hey, My bad!!
Must have gotten mixed up in the thread responses. Please forgive me and if we ever shall meet, I'll be happy to share some nice 21Yr + single-malt to show that I mean it.
You are on.
I've got a bottle of LochDhu I've been holding on to. It'll make a man of yea.
Wow, I had to look that up. You evil doer, now I have something else to lust for….
Just wondering, does it taste similar to the smokey taste of Laphroaig?
Also, just so you know, my real name is not Caitlyn so I probably won't change much after the scotch….
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
What ever man appears to me you have a bee on your bonnet about something.
No point conversing with you on this subject at all.
Night dude.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: NavyDoc
Looked it up and see that people either like it ( a few) or they really dump on it; that means I'll have to try it for myself.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
Look in the mirror you are the one not getting it.
As others have pointed out.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
What and go around in circles until you understand?.
Nope.
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: soulpowertothendegree
You seem to think you now about evolution......can you elaborate on how it requires creationism?...
Oh I don't know.....Maybe because there needs to be a reason for something to exist before it can evolve....That's a good start! We may have evolved, but God created us before we could evolve.....
originally posted by: buster2010
Who created God? God had to come from somewhere to exist.