It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Annee
German's are probably the most significant group in building this country.
Not at all.
The most significant group that built The U.S, where the first British Colonists who built the original colonies and went into the unknown possibly putting their lives at risk.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: nenothtu
Sorry, I have no idea what you mean, but I'm pretty sure I don't care, as it seems to be an attempt to insult me. I have made no claims for conquerors or the conquered. I don't even know what you're talking about.
originally posted by: nenothtu
Of course you don't ! I wouldn't, either, if I were in your shoes, so it's understandable to feign ignorance of the matter. Keeps one form having to respond to difficult questions.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Annee
I agree, but I wouldn't agree to banning it. That will just have the opposite effect and ingrain it even further into the Southern psyche. Just take it off the state buildings and educate people about its true past. Hopefully someday everyone comes around and the flag is no longer used.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Annee
German's are probably the most significant group in building this country.
Not at all.
The most significant group that built The U.S, where the first British Colonists who built the original colonies and went into the unknown possibly putting their lives at risk.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Annee
Germans only began arriving once the colonies had been established.
They also only settled mainly in New York and Pennsylvania.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: nenothtu
Of course you don't ! I wouldn't, either, if I were in your shoes, so it's understandable to feign ignorance of the matter. Keeps one form having to respond to difficult questions.
I swear, I'm going to quit asking for clarification on here. I am not "feigning" ignorance, I just don't understand you point. I make it a personal policy to either answer questions, ask for clarification or at least say I'm not going to answer.
So, never mind.
originally posted by: nenothtu
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: nenothtu
Of course you don't ! I wouldn't, either, if I were in your shoes, so it's understandable to feign ignorance of the matter. Keeps one form having to respond to difficult questions.
I swear, I'm going to quit asking for clarification on here. I am not "feigning" ignorance, I just don't understand you point. I make it a personal policy to either answer questions, ask for clarification or at least say I'm not going to answer.
So, never mind.
Fair enough. Have a nice day then.
For future reference, when "asking for clarification", it often helps to... ask for clarification.
For your edification in this "question", however, I will elucidate just a bit - you can read it or ignore it. Matters nary a whit.
1) The Confederacy Ceded from the US, and formed another nation.
2) the US didn't like the loss of agricultural base (not to mention the tax revenues from Confederate import/export trade), took exception, and invaded the Confederacy to re-annex it.
3) the US conquered the Confederacy, and did indeed re-annex it.
4) The US conquered what they like to claim now as "their own people".
5) Life is strange.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: nenothtu
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: nenothtu
Of course you don't ! I wouldn't, either, if I were in your shoes, so it's understandable to feign ignorance of the matter. Keeps one form having to respond to difficult questions.
I swear, I'm going to quit asking for clarification on here. I am not "feigning" ignorance, I just don't understand you point. I make it a personal policy to either answer questions, ask for clarification or at least say I'm not going to answer.
So, never mind.
Fair enough. Have a nice day then.
For future reference, when "asking for clarification", it often helps to... ask for clarification.
For your edification in this "question", however, I will elucidate just a bit - you can read it or ignore it. Matters nary a whit.
1) The Confederacy Ceded from the US, and formed another nation.
2) the US didn't like the loss of agricultural base (not to mention the tax revenues from Confederate import/export trade), took exception, and invaded the Confederacy to re-annex it.
3) the US conquered the Confederacy, and did indeed re-annex it.
4) The US conquered what they like to claim now as "their own people".
5) Life is strange.
The Civil War was about economics. Why was it about economics? Because the plantations could not be run without slave labor.
Anyway you twist it, it's still about slavery. About owning another human being. About forcing that human being to work for your own profit.
Slave laborers in Bangladesh probably have more rights.
That is what the Confederation is about. That is what the flag represents.
You can spout all you want about Seceding, about state rights, about not being controlled, etc etc ----- does not change the real bottom line.
There is no comparison between the U.S. flag and the Confederate flag.
"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
originally posted by: TheIceQueen
This is the type of thing that is really mind blowing to me. How can you and so many people think that the south (and it's flag) stood for slavery, and only that?
originally posted by: poncho1982
a reply to: TheIceQueen
Please, just stop.
You're making too much sense and I just can't handle it!
Seriously though, well said.