It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: JeanPaul
Capital, as in, the corporations/banks who run our governments & economies, would NOT be able to profit with a centralized global government. They need a bunch of separate nation states in order to chase cheap labor. In order to avoid providing safe workplace conditions. In order to avoid regulations. In order to avoid taxes. A centralized global government would be the last thing banks/corporations want.
Centralized global government is desirable to enshrine all those inequalities. Who told you that one government can't have different rulings, many tiers citizens and other mechanisms to help corporations in exploitation of different regions on Earth ?
With many nation states there is always a nasty chance that some nation will not play to the benefit of the multinational corporations.
Simply they want Corporations above any national state laws. And USA corporate law, patent law and other legal mechanisms will be the only arbitrator between them . All this backed by USA military power. One world government is USA corporate culture expanded into the whole world, it doesn't means some fancy social guarantees from the "government"
The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: gosseyn
The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.
Dear lord, don't you people ever learn?
This has been tried over and over again in Communist and Socialist countries. It is currently the way things are done in North Korea. It never works and never has.
Rampant capitalism is an evil, but Socialism is no better. No human system is.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: gosseyn
The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.
Dear lord, don't you people ever learn?
This has been tried over and over again in Communist and Socialist countries. It is currently the way things are done in North Korea. It never works and never has.
Rampant capitalism is an evil, but Socialism is no better. No human system is.
originally posted by: JeanPaul
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: gosseyn
The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.
Dear lord, don't you people ever learn?
This has been tried over and over again in Communist and Socialist countries. It is currently the way things are done in North Korea. It never works and never has.
Rampant capitalism is an evil, but Socialism is no better. No human system is.
What the heck does Juche have to do with socialism? What does an isolated North Korea have to do with socialism? North Korean land is not as fertile as South Korea. North Korea is run by some insane anti-democratic family. They're also isolated from global trade. It's very disingenuous to point to North Korea as being the ultimate failure of socialism, as with Mao's China. The entire idea of "socialism in one country" manifesting out of feudal conditions would have been laughable to Marx. It goes against everything he wrote.
Anyhow, with modern industrial farming techniques, high yield seeds and modern computing power planning large scale food production would not be an issue. If the soil and climate allows. You think the USA couldn't grow enough food for each American if trillions of dollars were shifted from war into planned food production? We could probably feed the entire western hemisphere.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: gosseyn
The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.
Dear lord, don't you people ever learn?
This has been tried over and over again in Communist and Socialist countries. It is currently the way things are done in North Korea. It never works and never has.
Rampant capitalism is an evil, but Socialism is no better. No human system is.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: incoserv
I agree that the idea of a global communist/socialist gov't is just stupid.
It is obviously oligarchist.
Most communist/socialist systems are oligarchies in disguise.
Hmm, I don't know about that.
And, most capitalistic societies are oligarchies in actuality, including ours. And it isn't really hidden...
Sure they are.
You have state control of everything, and the oligarchy consists of the privileged few the state deems smart enough to decide what is best for all the rest. Of course, they have access to the best of everything because they are the elites and deserve it. Besides the system has them in power so who stops them?
Whom do you think the communist party was in the old USSR? or the party officials in China today? They are oligarchs.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Astyanax
I think Marx never intended for all 10 to be used equally when he wrote the guidelines for Oligarchy.
But they are using the most effective planks as needed.
Banking and taxes etc.
All requiring massive authoritarian policies and massive enforcement structures.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: JeanPaul
I've heard those excuses before. They are nonsense.
I have lived under Socialist regimes. I know — intimately and in detail — how they work, or rather, don't work.
Have you read Marx? I have. A great writer, which is why so many fell under his spell. But he was a fantasist, not a realist, and his view of the world and of humanity was entirely fanciful, made up out of whole cloth. Apply logic and factual scrutiny to his arguments and they fall to pieces, just as all would-be Socialist and Communist regimes around the world have done — except, of course, for Cuba and North Korea, the exceptions that prove the rule. Brilliant examples of Marxist social engineering, aren't they?
Give it a rest, Jean-Paul. Marx was a great man in his way, and a revolutionary philosophy of some kind was desperately needed in Europe in his time; you could say, as he no doubt would have, that his appearance on the scene was a historical inevitability. But his work is done, his era is past, and it is high time his ideas were given a decent burial. Capitalism, too, is tottering on its pins — but we shan't need Marx to deliver the quietus.
I suspect that the future, like the past, belongs to absolutism. Given the magnitude of the challenge posed by overpopulation and climate change, it is probably the only form of government that can ensure our survival as a species.
Freedom, equality and democracy are fine things indeed, but they are summer's fruits, and the summer of human civilization is drawing to a close. Winter, as they say on a certain popular TV show, is coming.
originally posted by: gosseyn
The only solution if we don't want one day to be living is the sort of dystopia found in science-fiction is to abolish the market little by little. You have to realize that the market is not useful anymore for a series of activities, because we have attained a level technological prowess that makes the market obsolete. If you don't want to become one day a slave to a corporation, you have to make it so that your survival isn't tied to anything that has to do with the market. The first step IMO is to nationalize food production, let's say produce 50 different sorts of vegetables and fruits, until it becomes a public service, etc.. Then if you want a ferrari, you are free to become a slave to the market, it would be your choice.