It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: ketsuko
That's what the RCC advocates with their priests. Like you said, we see how that turned out.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest
Yet God tells us to be fruitful and multiply. Why would God make them asexual if he wants us to multiply? If he's ok with someone being asexual and even makes them that way then why would he not be ok with someone being born homosexual or not make them that way? Asexuality is natural but homosexuality isn't? Both come with the same consequence, no children.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: ketsuko
Jesus said his yoke was easy and burden light. If celibacy is not easy, it cannot be of Jesus, including for someone who is born gay.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: ketsuko
Yet you say he taught homosexuals to be celibate. If that was an aspect of his teaching in order to come to know God (for gay people), he is putting a heavy burden on them, because as you say, celibacy isn't easy.