It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Qspeedyrock
911 is a great example of this where the official story has been changed several times, has significant evidence which contradicts the official story.
originally posted by: babybunnies
Why not concentrate on out of place artifacts? None of them have ever been explained (especially nails made out of exotic alloys hundreds of milions or billions of years old.
originally posted by: babybunnies
There is a bit of discussion on David Kelly and the space plane, but my point is that neither of these very relevant topics have ever really take hold with mainstream conspiracy theorists, who tend to overlook the real stuff for the fake "moon landing" crap and all that.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: babybunnies
I have seen every single thing you mentioned discussed at lengths 1 million times more than would be considered great lengths on this and similar sites. Those are actually fairly tame ones. I should ask if you are awake?
"True conspiracy theorists find their OWN conspiracy theories, and only really pay scant attention to the ones in mainstream conspiracy discussions"
I know I am offended by that. I am thinking others are too. I will attention to conspiracy theories that interest me the most, both mentioned in MSM and not. THAT is closer to a 'true' conspiracy theorist, but I am not going to go as far as to define it for others on my own.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14 I have never heard it referred to as a 'mini space shuttle' but NASA launched an unmanned ship, it's in orbit, the government won't say it's purpose.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: babybunnies
Conspiracy within conspiracy is so hipster of you.