Door to Door Searches for NY Fugitives - Come on....

youtu.be...



What I find fascinating here is the obvious lack of urgency or caution. No guns drawn. No warrants.

So what's the point?

There is no probable cause to search these houses. The officers don't even seem to take it seriously. It seems like a farce. I would never consent to this.

a reply to: kosmicjack

It's for your safety and security.

Relax.

Trust your police-state. They know what's best.

Don't question it bro, it's just all routine. Nothing to see, all routine. Shhh, it's bed time.

Yeah, I don't see the point here. So I guess they don't need guns when looking for so called fugitives who might be armed themselves. Maybe it's just some sort of practice drill or something.

They're making note of the complainers. For when this is real.

lady in the video said she told them no,

if this is by consent only, and they are not forcing their way into houses, then i see no real issue here, let them search all they want, if time comes i can refuse and they will go on their way then i have no issue with it. why should anyone?

now if they were forcing their way into homes without consent THAT id have an issue with...

Excellent practice for the null-day scenario.

originally posted by: pryingopen3rdeye
lady in the video said she told them no,

if this is by consent only, and they are not forcing their way into houses, then i see no real issue here, let them search all they want, if time comes i can refuse and they will go on their way then i have no issue with it. why should anyone?

now if they were forcing their way into homes without consent THAT id have an issue with...

I read the replies and was pleasantly surprised there was a rational poster thank you. The guns weren't drawn they weren't kicking down doors because they didn't want to alarm anybody . They were going door-to-door to reassure people and to see whether they were denied entry by someone that was obviously terrified .

I guarantee you if they failed to do this and some people were being held hostage. Somebody would have a thread on here complaining about the police lack of action .

originally posted by: pryingopen3rdeye

lady in the video said she told them no,

They will place a rfid somewhere on the property for future reference.

a reply to: pryingopen3rdeye

Yes by consent.

So what's the point?

If there was actual danger they wouldn't need a warrant. If there were suspicions they would get one. Why the dog and pony show? At one point in the video an officer approaches a tarp covered boat - just like where Tzarnayev was hiding in Boston - and the officer seemed unconcerned. Not even wary.

Additionally it was reported that officers were going into vacant vacation properties. I'd like verification of that.

a reply to: Greathouse

It's quite rationale to guard your 4th amendment rights and to question police tactics concerning law-abiding private citizens.

a reply to: kosmicjack

But it's quite irrational to protest about someone's fourth amendment right. When the cops were asking permission and nobody was offended by it .

a reply to: Greathouse

How do you know no one was upset? Because a media puff piece to reassure citizens about Officer Friendly told you so?

I'm simply observing that the non-urgent nature of the voluntary searches belies the fact that it wasn't necessary in the first place and is over-policing.

originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: kosmicjack

But it's quite irrational to protest about someone's fourth amendment right. When the cops were asking permission and nobody was offended by it .

They are checking off their search boxes. This is the only way to track the validity of a full search.

They ask to search my house under these circumstances and I offer them free coffee and some sammiches for when they are on their way out. They are not the enemy, the Gestapo, the jack-boots. Sometimes what things appear to be, or you are told is, is exactly and only what they are.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Greathouse

How do you know no one was upset? Because a media puff piece to reassure citizens about Officer Friendly told you so?

I'm simply observing that the non-urgent nature of the voluntary searches belies the fact that it wasn't necessary in the first place and is over-policing.

I can only assume you would've preferred the way they did it the way they did in Watertown? Or is it that you don't care which way they did it you just have a problem with authority?


Review my post history. I have no problem calling the police a turd when they stink, in this case they didn't .

originally posted by: tkwasny

originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: kosmicjack

But it's quite irrational to protest about someone's fourth amendment right. When the cops were asking permission and nobody was offended by it .

They are checking off their search boxes. This is the only way to track the validity of a full search.

They ask to search my house under these circumstances and I offer them free coffee and some sammiches for when they are on their way out. They are not the enemy, the Gestapo, the jack-boots. Sometimes what things appear to be, or you are told is, is exactly and only what they are.

Thank you for the rational reply !

People hate cops. There are good cops and I agree there are bad cops. But regardless of their position if your life is in danger they will step into the line of fire for you .

And there's the added bonus of the pigs encouraging your neighbors to spy on you like a bunch of peeping f# toms:

Law enforcement officials reiterated their plea for the public's help in reporting anything unusual in the area since the prison break, which was discovered over the weekend.

"We don't want them out searching the woods," Favro said. "But if you're sitting on your porch, get your binoculars out and see if you see something unusual."

originally posted by: RealTruthSeeker
Yeah, I don't see the point here. So I guess they don't need guns when looking for so called fugitives who might be armed themselves. Maybe it's just some sort of practice drill or something.

Well the whole story does seem a little farcical, doesn't it?

Now, when you mention "practice drill", that gives me the creeps.
Are the two escaped convicts our next 'Murkan T'rrorists?
What's the plan?
Where and what are they going to hit? (Or should I say, 'be charged with hitting' when they're already dead).
These two guys are totally dispensable and nobody will miss them when they're 'disappeared' by Gov entities.

Sorry, but this entire 'movie script' sounds alot like the buildup to 9/11, as well as the other ones which involved coordinated military/police drills prior to their enactment. Their plots are always absurd. The two escaped cons will never be 'found', then they'll be terminated before the false flag gets to be enacted and they'll be blamed for it.

When it looks acted, it IS acted. All participants are being paid off with big sums to offset the so-called 'damage' that individuals and families are to endure when the faux plan gets exposed in the media.
Like Joycie and her hubbie and step-son + wife...already ridiculed, but they'll be fine; they're covered.
You know...like Sandy Hook.

This isn't real, guys. I sense the essence of farce and ridicule that usually accompanies these government plots.

Joycie's gonna be one rich lady!