It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 321Go
Anu, I'm not knocking your beliefs – everyone has a right to believe in what they want – but how do you know this if it's a secret? Are you not afraid that some secret official will come looking for you now that you've made it public knowledge?
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Legman
Yes this is where the story of the boy who cried wolf has relevance.
How many habital planets are in the known Universe?
People lieing diverts from the people who have experience.
Yes, compelling evidence and lots of big numbers "helps" to establish, but, ultimately, has NOT YET established AS "FACT", AS "TRUTH". Not yet "beyond a reasonable doubt". It is not that we "want to doubt", we do not.
originally posted by: Outrageo
a reply to: Emerys
What will it take? A landing on the proverbial White House Lawn? Sure, that'll work. A visit to my own bedroom, probe in hand? Undoubtedly, for me, yes, that will definitely be convincing enough. A mass arrival of ships over every major city. Umm, yep - I'm in.
None of those things have happened yet. So you can shrill at 'trolls', accuse those not jumping on your wagon of anything that makes you feel better, do all manner of thumping and screeching - but it's still not "proof".
I completely disagree with that statement. The argument used as proof is not well written. For a start, there is no definition of 'alien' – it could be any type of life at all. If it's microbial then I would agree that aliens almost certainly exist. If it's intelligent life similar to our own, then I would refer you to my post made earlier – that our own existence is more or less a fluke and it is not destined to be on this planet, or any other.
For a start, there is no definition of 'alien'
Full Definition of ALIEN
1
a : belonging or relating to another person, place, or thing : strange
b : relating, belonging, or owing allegiance to another country or government : foreign
c : exotic 1
2
: differing in nature or character typically to the point of incompatibility
— alien·ly adverb
differing in nature or character typically to the point of incompatibility
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
People lieing diverts from the people who have experience. The wolf is real. Funny thing is, The alien i saw showed my friend and i one of its veried shapeshifted forms which was a large blacker than pitch black wolf with no eyes or interior detail really. Looked like a 3-D outline of a shadow impossibly black. Well it's not really impossible since i saw it. But in terms of just a black room. It would have a clear outline in a room with no light. It was pretty Trippy, Or psychedelic if you want to define Trippy as such. I wasn't on drugs and my friend i was with was having a psychotic nervious breakdown. Now he is an alcoholic.
Aliens are serious buisness.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: Emerys
a reply to: Legman
So 70,000 annual reports of UFO sightings are not evidence?
No, they are not. Most of those are misidentifactions, and the remaining few that are actually 'unknowns' are not conclusive. If there were actual, conclusive evidence, it would be on every television station and the front page of every newspaper on the planet.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: enlightenedservant
That would be like saying the mice don't exist until the moment you notice them
I guess I need to get more specific. I'm talking about mice that come inside my house and stay for the winter. I usually expect them late September into October. These are real sneaky critters that can get into the tiniest openings and you really don't notice them unless you know what to look for
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
answers.yahoo.com...
answers.yahoo.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I wrote my experiences here if you are interested in reading them. My first experience happened almost 6 years ago, Since it was in July and its not exactly july yet which is why i said it was almost 6 years ago.
Instead of going to mufon, I just wrote them there just cuz. In hindsight. I should of probably wrote it to Mufon. But the reason why i didnt is because i met one of the directors of Mufon and he was kinda a cheeseball so i decided not to. Dude was trying to tell me what i was seeing was a being in the 5th dimension as if he cannot concieve this creature i saw was from another planet. Not some rip in the sky to some other universe.... now thinking about it. Mufon would of totally desicrated my experience with a bunch of Archon like Gnosis bullshot. Enjoy my archived experience lol. I cant tell the other experiences because it's weirder because i used biblical crap and well. I'm not going to really elaborate. Maybe il post it one day but for now. This experience will do.
We can't say aliens don't exist just because we don't recognize them or their technologies. Because we simply won't notice them unless we know what to look for.
Ha! I'm not going to discuss semantics (or indeed grammar) with you, regardless of how much I'd like to, but that story was not well written or argued.
Suffice it to say, that if I were to make up a story like this it would be infinitely more believable.
originally posted by: JackHill
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: Emerys
a reply to: Legman
So 70,000 annual reports of UFO sightings are not evidence?
No, they are not. Most of those are misidentifactions, and the remaining few that are actually 'unknowns' are not conclusive. If there were actual, conclusive evidence, it would be on every television station and the front page of every newspaper on the planet.
Most the remaining 'unknown' are alien spacecrafts. People have seen and interacted with these alien beings. You seem to conveniently forget that.
Oh yeah, nevermind... they're all lying, ill or mistaken. Sure...
From 1:17 (ignore the subtitles).
There, proved.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: JackHill
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: Emerys
a reply to: Legman
So 70,000 annual reports of UFO sightings are not evidence?
No, they are not. Most of those are misidentifactions, and the remaining few that are actually 'unknowns' are not conclusive. If there were actual, conclusive evidence, it would be on every television station and the front page of every newspaper on the planet.
Most the remaining 'unknown' are alien spacecrafts. People have seen and interacted with these alien beings. You seem to conveniently forget that.
Oh yeah, nevermind... they're all lying, ill or mistaken. Sure...
From 1:17 (ignore the subtitles).
There, proved.
*sigh*
Again, you've proved nothing.