NATO forces crossed the Ukrainian border yesterday

One of our readers sent to us the pictures below. The images were made on ninth of June at the Záhony border crossing on the early afternoon on the Hungarian side, the special convoy of vehicles went to Ukraine.

Carpathian Herald







They may have just lost their way?

Over 1700 foreign and domestic troops are involved in what promises to be the year's biggest test of logistics abilities for the NATO forces and their partner countries.

Over the course of this week alone over 300 troops will be coming from about 20 countries, and will be operating nearly 250 pieces of military logistics equipment, which have not been specified.

NATO military exercise gets underway in Hungary

We tried to ask for information from the Ukrainian Border Police, but unfortunately we did not get an answer. Based on the images it seems to be military equipment.

The Ukrainian cabinet of ministers has nominated the former president of Georgia, Mikhail "tie eater 08.08.08" Saakashvili as the governor of Ukraine’s coastal Odessa region. For his part, Saakashvili announced his intentions to: demonstrate (as in Georgia) “zero tolerance of corruption”.

Saakashvili has been placed on an international wanted list in his own country. Georgia is now chasing its former president with criminal charges of abuse of authority.


Transnistria is under blockade now.

Is the criminal puppet from Georgia must try to start war against Russia again and will attack Transnistria?

Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk says there are 10,000 Russian military boots on their soil in an interview with Wolf Blitzer.
Interactive map of war in Ukraine
MAP

The question is who has invited who.

a reply to: maghun

Can you show me where Transnistria (who Russia agreed in the 90's to leave and never did) is under blockade?

Kind of funny. Only here is Russia illegally putting boots in other countries, and breaking treaties in promising they won't, and they are the good guys.

Is the criminal puppet from Georgia must try to start war against Russia again and will attack Transnistria?

C'mon man, at least have the decency to SEEM like you're on a western (mostly American) message board! That sentence makes NO sense.

With a rather "LARGE" hint of sarcasm...

Most of us know darned well that the MSM in most Western countries will say that this is for humanitarian reasons as usual to keep the populace happy and doped down before heading off to switch channels to a reality show...

Thanks for the thread and links... will follow closely as living in Europe and not far from all those troubled borders.

Kindest respects

Rodinus

a reply to: dollukka

Yatsenyuk says

Any evidence? Perhaps a picture? Or a satellite image? According to the present ukrainian leadership and the NATO officials the Russian forces invaded "former Ukraine" multiple times in the last year, but all the available high tech equipment couldn't have seen it.

Who invited NATO to Ukraine? After one year of lies and civil war only 43% of the remnanat ukrainians want to join NATO. The last poll was made by an ukrainian institute in March:


Ukraine–NATO relations

a reply to: maghun

No one says they need to join NATO. NATO already refused them membership in the past, if NATO really wanted the Ukraine, then the Ukraine would be part of NATO already.

What does any of that have to do with the fact Ukrainians DEFINITELY do not want to be part of Russia, and that Russia has invaded them numerous times?

Russia does not even deny troops are there and equipment is there, they just claim they are there on vacation.

US never invaded Iraq, our soldiers only vacationed there, are you buying that?

In the East only 26 percent favor being closer to Russia as do 20 percent in the South. Even in the rebel-held areas of the Donbass less than half (45 percent) favor stronger relations with Russia.

Very large majorities in all regions reject Putin’s position that Russia has the right to intervene in other countries to protect Russian citizens and Russian speakers (87 percent overall). In the rebel-held areas views are divided. Russian speakers themselves overwhelmingly reject it.

Both Ukraine and Georgia applied for NATO membership.

Both were rejected.

Both were then attacked by Russia.

a reply to: Wookiep

Sorry, hope you deciphered it.

Nowadays I prefer learning russian instead of english... The front is coming to Europe soon.

Не стреляйте, я друг!

a reply to: maghun

You can learn whatever language you like. If you think Russia has any chance to defeat the West in your lifetime you are sadly mistaken.

Which of course has nothing to do with NATO exercises in Ukraine, which have been going on since the 90s.

What was US senator McCain doing in Ukraine at the onset of revolution.

Why did United States spend 5 billion dollars on Ukrainian NGO groups.

They incited until they incited major protest in the capital.

Are you willing to contemplate this :

In his address to the Russian Parliament on 18 April 2014, in which President Putin justified the annexation of the Crimea, he stressed the humiliation Russia had suffered due to many broken promises by the West, including the alleged promise not to enlarge NATO beyond the borders of a reunited Germany.

Putin touched a responsive chord among his audience.

For more than 20 years the narrative of the alleged “broken promise” of not enlarging NATO eastward is part and parcel of Russia’s post-Soviet identity.

It is hardly surprising, therefore, that this narrative has resurfaced in the context of the Ukraine crisis. Dwelling on the past remains the most convenient tool to distract from the present.

More here : www.nato.int...

Not being PRO Russian but keeping my blinkers off and being open minded...

Kindest respects

Rodinus

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

a reply to: FerengiGrandProxy

Or the people were unhappy with corruption for years, and even Eastern Ukraine and Crimea did not like the government and thought Russia was meddling too much.

Even Eastern Ukraine rebels want to be as close to NATO and the West as they do to Russia, and many of them are unhappy with what Putin is doing.

originally posted by: Nibbles
Are you willing to contemplate this :

In his address to the Russian Parliament on 18 April 2014, in which President Putin justified the annexation of the Crimea, he stressed the humiliation Russia had suffered due to many broken promises by the West, including the alleged promise not to enlarge NATO beyond the borders of a reunited Germany.

Can you show me where that is in writing? Why should Russia have ANY SAY AT ALL over what a sovereign Nation can and can not do?

Putin touched a responsive chord among his audience. For more than 20 years the narrative of the alleged “broken promise” of not enlarging NATO eastward is part and parcel of Russia’s post-Soviet identity. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that this narrative has resurfaced in the context of the Ukraine crisis. Dwelling on the past remains the most convenient tool to distract from the present.

Yes, Putin is very good with words and inspiring nationalism. He used false flag attacks against his own people to justify attacking Chechnya.


What does any of that have to do with the fact that both Ukraine and Georgia wanted to become part of NATO, NATO rejected them, and then Russia attacked them?

a reply to: maghun

LOL, I had to use Google translate for - Не стреляйте, я друг!

Don't be afraid, sheesh@!

Just use English here..whenever possible....

Occ...

Thank you for your response to my post.

Read my post thoroughly if I may invite you to do so... and also look at the link I provided... (sorry but working at the moment so don't have much time to look for PEER reviewed articles or other links)... However, maybe you can if you have more time?

Just need to be open minded respected member.

kindest respects

Rodinus

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

a reply to: Wookiep

He was saying he needs to know that, so when Russia invades and conquers Europe he can tell their soldiers not to shoot him, he is pro Russian.

a reply to: Nibbles

I did. Per YOUR source ...

Yet even these additional sources do not change the fundamental conclusion: there have never been political or legally binding commitments of the West not to extend NATO beyond the borders of a reunified Germany.

There was no such agreement. It does not exist. Again I ask, why should Russia have any control over another Nation and what allies they may or may not have?

originally posted by: Nibbles
With a rather "LARGE" hint of sarcasm...

Most of us know darned well that the MSM in most Western countries will say that this is for humanitarian reasons as usual to keep the populace happy and doped down before heading off to switch channels to a reality show...

Thanks for the thread and links... will follow closely as living in Europe and not far from all those troubled borders.

Kindest respects

Rodinus

Lol
Forgot that 'Rodinus' was writing your posts "Nibbles"
Rookie error mate...



Back on topic, thanks for that OP, this is a serious development and I am fearful for what may come from this part of the world.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Oh ok. I got that he is pro Russian, but damn! Thanks for clearing that up...