It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: texasgirl
You're completely missing the point here. You're claiming that our perspective is the more correct one based on what one girl said. You are however only repeating statements that reflect your preconceived notion. Hey, if you want to delude yourself into thinking it's on the up and up and devoid of hypocrisy that's your call. Personally O agree with several other posters in that both sides or rather all 3( attendees of party, residents of the community and the actions of the police) are completely at fault for the end result. Every one of them needs to own their responsibility here.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: texasgirl
So one teen is dumb enough to say what she said while the adults may be smart enough to not broadcast that?
Still seems like a he said she said.
What I have noticed, is anyone defending the officer wants to talk about everything but what he did to that 15 year old girl.
I agree it sounds like the cops needed to come and break things up, I agree that the cop had reason to pull his gun like he did when those two kids did what they did.
What I do not agree with is how he man handled that girl for talking back.
Nothing can justify how that happened.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The core issue is that parties were wrong on BOTH sides.
And the officer in question acted out of line.
I honestly don't know why this is getting so much media attention.
Oh wait, I do. The whole "Black Lives Matter" movement and the good Rev Al Sharpton gotta stoke the fires of race hate to line their pockets.
So it's just a coincidence that this incident happens, protesters show up, and home's just mysteriously get vandalized and people get death threats?!
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Is it possible that the people that were protesting were not the ones doing vandalizing and threatening?
Crazy idea I know but it just might be true.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So it's just a coincidence that this incident happens, protesters show up, and home's just mysteriously get vandalized and people get death threats?!
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Is it possible that the people that were protesting were not the ones doing vandalizing and threatening?
Crazy idea I know but it just might be true.
Nah, they couldn't POSSIBLY be connected!
Come on now.
There are few coincidences that would be on the scale as this one, if true.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
It is possible sure.
Or people that had nothing to do with the protest were the ones that did it.
Why is that not just as likely?
I'm saying the national attention given to this relatively minor spat is causing undesirable people to descend onto the community under the guise of being protesters and stir up the pot. If the protesters weren't there, I doubt there would have been vandalism and death threats against homeowners in the subdivision. Of course, anything is possible, these are just my thoughts on the matter.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
It would seem more that the event its self was the trigger of the vandalism and the threats.
Are you saying those would not have happened if the protests didn't?