It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But a couple degrees colder would bring serious adverse consequences for habitats, wildlife, agriculture and humanity. This does not mean another Pleistocene ice age — with glaciers obliterating forests and cities under mile-thick walls of ice across North America, Europe and Asia. It may not even mean a full-blown little ice age.
However, just a 2-degree drop in average global temperatures would shrink growing seasons, cropland and wildlife habitats. Agriculture would be curtailed across Canada, northern Europe and Russia, putting greater pressure on remaining land to feed hungry families without turning more habitats into cropland. Land now devoted to corn for ethanol would have to be returned to food crops.
Our ability to feed Earth’s growing population would be seriously impaired, especially if radical environmentalists continue opposing chemical fertilizers, insecticides, biotechnology and mechanized farming. Those technologies would ensure far more food per acre under colder conditions, even if anti-hydrocarbon policies mean crops are starved for carbon dioxide.
I presume that is good news?
Today, atmospheric CO2 levels are rising so quickly that the ocean is absorbing CO2 faster than the Earth can respond, making the world's oceans more acidic and affecting marine life.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Phage
Maybe it is that we need to keep doing what we are doing to keep the earth warm. We need to cause global warming to combat global cooling.
originally posted by: mtnshredder
I know this topic always opens up a can of worms from the nay-sayers but it's a very much a reality, just saying.
originally posted by: JUhrman
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Phage
Maybe it is that we need to keep doing what we are doing to keep the earth warm. We need to cause global warming to combat global cooling.
Or maybe we should put the American population in FEMA camps and eliminate them for being the biggest consumers and wasters on this planet, before they destroy it.
You know, just a stupid solution to a stupid assumption.
originally posted by: mtnshredder
There's many energy alternatives that don't exist or are not explored because of the lack of corporate profits.
originally posted by: JUhrman
originally posted by: mtnshredder
There's many energy alternatives that don't exist or are not explored because of the lack of corporate profits.
That's not even true. They exist and are profitable. Just not to the oil industry.
Lobbyists, like marketers, are one of the greatest plagues the earth has ever known these last decades. The fact that they have taken over the US government scares me very much.
originally posted by: Infinitis
a reply to: Cinrad
what would happen if water turned to ethanol?
Is this not the crazy question forum?