It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: Entreri06
No.
Hoax means intention to deceive...offering the word proof in the title, when it turns out the proof isn't exactly convincing, doesn't necessarily equal intention to deceive..it could be misinterpretation of the evidence or similar.
So no auto trip to the hoax bin imo.
originally posted by: Metallicus
Any religious thread that goes on as if God doesn't or does exist should be hoaxed. The fact is I am guilty of this myself, but really an Agnostic position is the only logical position when it comes to the existence of God. There is no 'proof' either way except what an individual experiences.
originally posted by: rickymouse
What proof do you have that this will work out better. You said proof in your title.
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: Entreri06
No.
Hoax means intention to deceive...offering the word proof in the title, when it turns out the proof isn't exactly convincing, doesn't necessarily equal intention to deceive..it could be misinterpretation of the evidence or similar.
So no auto trip to the hoax bin imo.
originally posted by: Darkblade71
a reply to: Entreri06
Sometimes even when proof is offered, it is disregarded.
It is very hard to define what is proof is to someone, especially in metaphysical,ufo,paranormal, or religious topics.
So my answer would be no.
Because that is not a hoax.
originally posted by: Iwinder
originally posted by: rickymouse
What proof do you have that this will work out better. You said proof in your title.
LOL, I don't think the title of a thread should be considered factual. That is why we have the option to click on a certain thread and discuss things or bail after reading the OP.
Thanks for the Laugh Rickymouse:-)
Regards, Iwinder