It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
simply....because no one will touch it. No judge in the western world. And you know it...
I do know that there have been legal cases taken against the Saudi state for their alleged involvement.
no there haven't been any. Feel free to show me. There have been attempts...and...as I said...Judge threw it out. Same as would be with any such case.
Indeed, but OP is hoping that merely asking the question will make the Official Story believable. Its his "thing". Pay no mind.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
In order to make a case out of this...a "group" would need to be able to look at evidence...which we know is mostly destroyed. Tapes withheld under "national security" excuse. Able Danger data destroyed. So how can you build a case that would stand up in court ? All we "truthers" have are holes in the "official" story....and admittedly..many assumptions.
Well then again you could argue that there is a case to be answered for the destruction of evidence push through the courts to have all classified information released, even if part of the trial has to be heard behind locked doors. Then you continue to build from their.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly
Are you kidding me? Any judge with favours on the Right would have jumped on the opportunity to criticize the Left administration.
Yes, an ideal judge is impartial, but then, do we live in an ideal world?
If no judge touched it, there must have been some other reason. Something perhaps like, Lack of Strong Evidences?
After all, remember that Russia too has an advantage at proving that 9/11 would have been carried out from the inside. Yet even Russia herself did not go through with it. She went through with Snowden and the NSA, but not with 9/11.
Logic dictates that the case was simply not strong enough.
I believe the OP has a very good point indeed.
For me I can be reasonably be sure Cheney was involved, but I havn't found anything proving whether he would be an idea man, a straight actor who commited a crime, or maybe he was blackmailed..
I just don't have enough data. I can't act on it.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: KnightLight
You mean all your data comes from conspiracy sites.