It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Answer
Well, i don't know, isn't it more a show of a problem with the society, than a reason for gun ownership.
Here is the reason why guns for the public is a bad idea, though ironically it is also the reason you have to own one for protection, not that it helps much in most cases.
CLICK ME
GUN VIOLENCE ARCHIVE 2015 TOLL OF GUN VIOLENCE ( So far )
Total Number of Incidents: 15,600
Number of Deaths1: 4,087
Number of Injuries1: 7,542
Number of Children (age 0-11) Killed/Injured1: 201
Number of Teens (age 12-17) Killed/Injured1: 737
Mass Shooting2: 80
Officer Involved Shooting2: 1,431
Home Invasion2: 702
Defensive Use2: 403
Accidental Shooting2: 669
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
Should the speed limit be 15 mph everywhere?
Those statistics don't show the crimes preempted by a potential victim with a gun.
Motor vehicles, electricity, and reservoirs kill people also.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Those statistics don't show the crimes preempted by a potential victim with a gun.
Yes it does, you should look a little closer.
Motor vehicles, electricity, and reservoirs kill people also.
Different issues taken cared of in other ways and IMO not comparable, irrelevant.
originally posted by: superman2012
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: superman2012
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: superman2012
Or women who have little to no chance of protecting themselves when the ex comes busting through the door to "teach her a lesson".
Gee, there's just such a story in the OP's opening two posts.
Right, how many stories are there where the cops intercede before? I wonder what the ratio is, cops helping, to women shooting their ex's? Whatever though, let's keep guns in everyone's hands because of fear.
The only fear I see demonstrated is the one you've got for your fellow law abiding citizens. Me owning or carrying a firearm does not put you at risk in any way, shape, or form.
Would you fire at someone in a mall (if you carry in public) if they were shooting up the place? What if you miss? I have no fear, only amusement that someone feels they need to carry a firearm because they are so afraid.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
It wasn't a given?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
...my waking life is mostly consumed with work, anime, and sushi. Oh, and arcades.
I see you conveniently left out Midget Porn.
originally posted by: Gothmog
Way more people are killed or injured in and around their homes from other things than weapons. Showers , ladders , you name it. Lets all call the government in and ban ALL dangerous items just not "guns" . Oh , but this usually happens as an accident. But , so does most of the gun injuries and deaths. How about automobile accidents ? I did not even count those in in the first statement . Everyone has to take a driving test to get a license to drive. This test is supposedly to make sure a person knows how to RESPONSIBLY operate a vehicle. Do they ? Took a cruise down a major highway lately ? Maybe we should be talking about banning issues or stricter automobile driver "regulations". Guns , autos , showers dont kill people the people kill people. Oh , wait, a person can live without a gun , right? Tell that to some victims that could have used one but could not have one. Ghandi once stated the darkest day ever in his country was the day the government took the weapons of the people.
But they are comparable. They're both tools capable of killing someone in the wrong hands. Assault someone with EITHER of these tools and it's "assault with a deadly weapon".
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
It's a different problem, that in 99% of the cases are accidents, not intentional, and part of a society that couldn't work without, not comparable.
I never mentioned anything about any ban of anything, simply cause it wont work, the problem is there but not fixable, neither with ban or laws because the insane amount of guns in the public is already there and don't go away with ban or laws.
I'm sorry you don't feel like debating, I feel I raise valid points. They're both deadly weapons. Yes the circumstances for their use is different, and 61% of gun deaths are suicides, but they're both still deadly weapons.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Sigh...
You win, i'm not in the mood for illogical discussions.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Those statistics don't show the crimes preempted by a potential victim with a gun.
Yes it does, you should look a little closer.
Motor vehicles, electricity, and reservoirs kill people also.
Different issues taken cared of in other ways and IMO not comparable, irrelevant.