It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: johnwick
a reply to: Violater1
Lol 9 ships?
That is like the minimum number required to call it joint naval training exercises.
www.informationclearinghouse.info...
Did a Chinese-Russian-Iranian Coalition Opposing NATO Debut in Moscow?
By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
May 03, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "RT" - The Moscow Conference on International Security in April was used as a venue to give notice to the US and NATO that other world powers will not let it do as it pleases.
Talk about joint efforts between China, India, Russia and Iran against NATO expansion were augmented with plans for tripartite military talks between Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran.
Defense ministers and military officials from all over the world gathered on April 16 at the landmark Radisson Royal or Hotel Ukraina, one of the best pieces of Soviet architecture in Moscow, which is known as one of the “Seven Sisters” that were constructed during Joseph Stalin’s time. The two-day event hosted by the Russian Defense Ministry was the fourth annual Moscow Conference on International Security (MCIS).
Civilian and military officials from over seventy countries, including NATO members, attended. Fifteen defense ministers took part in the event. However, aside from Greece, defense ministers of NATO countries did not participate in the conference.
Unlike previous years, the MCIS organizers did not send Ukraine an invitation for 2015’s confab. According to Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov, “At this stage of the brutal information antagonism in regard to the crisis in southeastern Ukraine, we decided not to inflame the situation at the conference and at this stage made the decision not to invite our Ukrainian colleagues to the event.”
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: the2ofusr1
I told SO a couple of months ago when he made a re-cap about all the "important" things which ATS was on top off in 2014, that the ATS crowed completely missed the biggest thing which went on...the teaming up of Russia and China !
It seems that even though a good number of respondents see the DPR and LPR more or less as terrorist organisations, they are not as eager to support the antiterrorist operations, which leads to conclude that they hope for alternative ways of resolving the conflict. In fact, 70.3% responded in favor of negotiations and peaceful means of conflict resolution in Donbass, with only 20.6% supporting military action. Even in the West macro-region, which seems to have the most negative sentiments towards the LPR and DPR and is most pro-Kyiv government, only 27% responded in favor of military actions with a majority of 60.8% for peaceful negotiations.
Exercises have long been exhibitions of power and demonstrations of power projection. Russia and China are showing that they can project power wherever they want to.
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: Violater1
Looks to me like the chess pieces are being put into position. I could be wrong but why not hold the exercises in China Sea or the Pacific?
Cheers - Dave
www.informationclearinghouse.info... Them being very close to Iran who is on their side and who was a earlier target of the plan to over throw multipal countries just might be the place to take on the US and it's proxies .
US “Grand Strategy” For War Against China Laid Out
By Nick Beams
May 02, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "WSWS" - The advanced stage of discussions in US foreign policy circles over the pursuit of an ever-more aggressive policy toward China has been revealed by the recent release of a chilling report under the auspices of the influential Council on Foreign Relations.
Entitled “Revising US Grand Strategy Toward China,” the report is nothing less than an agenda for war. It is authored by Robert D. Blackwill and Ashley J. Tellis, both of whom have close connections to the US State Department and various American foreign policy think tanks.
The report cites a publication produced during World War II defining “grand strategy” as one that “so integrates the policies and armaments of a nation that the resort to war is either rendered unnecessary or is undertaken with the maximum chance of victory.” This is not merely a concept of war but “an inherent element of statecraft at all times.”
The report’s central theme is that US global dominance is threatened by the rise of China and this process must be reversed by economic, diplomatic and military means.
Significantly, at the beginning of the report, its authors cite the Pentagon’s Defence Planning Guidance document of 1992, produced in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, which insisted that US strategy had to “refocus on precluding the emergence of any potential future global competitor.”
While asserting that China has a “grand strategy” for regional and ultimately global domination, the authors make clear they regard the threat to the US position as arising from China’s economic growth within the present international order.
originally posted by: ressiv
the wihsdom comes from the east ....that is wat we have learned :-)))))))))))
originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
originally posted by: ressiv
the wihsdom comes from the east ....that is wat we have learned :-)))))))))))
Is that why China copies EVERYTHING and does a horrible job at that? They probably have a million patent suits against them lol. This is how inventors get rich in the U.S. anymore. Make something, collect and save up the money for attorneys and when China copies it, wait for it to make a boat load of money and then sue them for all the money they made as well. Its a long stressful process but the military contractors never win, only silly commercial products that the Chicoms do not go to great lengths to protect.