It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was indeed a home invasion, but the people who were pouring in were Wisconsin law-enforcement officers. Armed, uniformed police swarmed into the house. Plainclothes investigators cornered her and her newly awakened family. Soon, state officials were seizing the family’s personal property, including each person’s computer and smartphone, filled with the most intimate family information. Why were the police at Anne’s home? She had no answers. The police were treating them the way they’d seen police treat drug dealers on television. In fact, TV or movies were their only points of reference, because they weren’t criminals. They were law-abiding. They didn’t buy or sell drugs. They weren’t violent. They weren’t a danger to anyone. Yet there were cops — surrounding their house on the outside, swarming the house on the inside. They even taunted the family as if they were mere “perps.” As if the home invasion, the appropriation of private property, and the verbal abuse weren’t enough, next came ominous warnings. Don’t call your lawyer. Don’t tell anyone about this raid. Not even your mother, your father, or your closest friends.
originally posted by: jefwane
Wisconsin's Shame: 'I thought it was a home invasion'
It was indeed a home invasion, but the people who were pouring in were Wisconsin law-enforcement officers. Armed, uniformed police swarmed into the house. Plainclothes investigators cornered her and her newly awakened family. Soon, state officials were seizing the family’s personal property, including each person’s computer and smartphone, filled with the most intimate family information. Why were the police at Anne’s home? She had no answers. The police were treating them the way they’d seen police treat drug dealers on television. In fact, TV or movies were their only points of reference, because they weren’t criminals. They were law-abiding. They didn’t buy or sell drugs. They weren’t violent. They weren’t a danger to anyone. Yet there were cops — surrounding their house on the outside, swarming the house on the inside. They even taunted the family as if they were mere “perps.” As if the home invasion, the appropriation of private property, and the verbal abuse weren’t enough, next came ominous warnings. Don’t call your lawyer. Don’t tell anyone about this raid. Not even your mother, your father, or your closest friends.
If only a third of the allegations in this piece by the National Review are true it should concern you no matter your political affiliation. It has everything you'd expect from a totalitarian political regime, secret warrants against "John Doe", intimidation by police and prosecutors,threats to not tell anyone not even your lawyer,rubber stamped subpoenas by a partisan judge, and after reading about it leaves one feeling we live in a nation even less impressive than it was before reading.
I had truly thought I was unable to be shocked by the actions of the partisans on either side of the US political spectrum, but this is truly frightening. If the courts do not both put a stop to this and punish the DA and judges that partisanly pursued this, when does it become "necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them"?
A truly frightening example of how low partisanship has brought us as a nation.
Archer started the job last week, making $113,025 a year, or 31% more than the $86,278 earned by the woman who had held the job for more than a decade.
originally posted by: jefwane
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Someone didn't read the article I see. I have time so I'll humor your lack of inquisitiveness with a short synopsis.
A hard partisan Democrat DA and Judge used their powers to initiate a witch hunt against people who used their Natural Rights of speech and assembly protected in the US by the First Amendment. This happened around the time of the Walker recall and again at his re-election.
From the article
Archer started the job last week, making $113,025 a year, or 31% more than the $86,278 earned by the woman who had held the job for more than a decade.
I would think any true fiscal conservative would be questioning that. What did she do to earn that if it wasn't political favor?