It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ZakOlongapo
a reply to: intrptr
only problem is there is no asteroids vaporizing so much H20, not even comets, all dry over there…
originally posted by: ZakOlongapo
a reply to: Kapusta
wow. if pictures from 1981 looks bettter then pics from 2015-2014 from mars by nasa... it means it all stinks by BS to high haven... all we know is lie... hmmm
originally posted by: raikata
I cant help it, I need to ask. I am not looking for a conspiracy here, but how did we get from the "Red planet" to the Yellowish? planet? I mean, I see this dark red picture of Mars and recently we have seen other pictures where the colors are completely different
originally posted by: raikata
I cant help it, I need to ask. I am not looking for a conspiracy here, but how did we get from the "Red planet" to the Yellowish? planet? I mean, I see this dark red picture of Mars and recently we have seen other pictures where the colors are completely different
Jim Bell, an astronomer at Arizona State University who is the lead scientist for the Opportunity rover's panoramic camera, has acknowledged that getting the colors right "is not an exact science." To make the job easier, color calibration targets have been installed on Opportunity as well as the Curiosity rover. Pictures from Mars are adjusted so that they reflect the colors and brightness as seen on the targets.
originally posted by: bullcat
Russian technology is obviously inferior.
Has the US ever put probes on Venus and taken pictures of that or higher quality?
Can you also link to the source and full size pictures please.
originally posted by: wildespace.....
Granted, Venus and Merecury aren't precisely tidally locked, but the Sun's gravitational influence does play a big role. Consider the orbit and rotation of Mercury with respect to the Sun: en.wikipedia.org... In its very elongated orbit, Mercury seems to be tidally locked when nearest to the Sun, but the Sun "lets it go" when Mercury is the furthest away, allowing it to make half a turn.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: wildespace
That makes the most sense. The side of the planet rotating away from the sun should be pulled harder, the closer in.
These two points are close but not the same. So imagine an object being tugged at one point, but swiveling about another point a few meters or more away. This creates a torque.
originally posted by: Misterlondon
But the landscape in the 2 pics look very different.. was this probe able to move?
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: intrptr
Forgive me, so Venus is slower rotation than Earth? Because of the Suns gravity? Maybe earth would be pulled into slowing down some if it were closer.
That's not the way it works. Rotation is not affected by gravity that way.