It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Does New FBI 9/11 ‘Saudi’ Report Deflect From Clandestine Realities?

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 01:38 PM

The FBI is now accused of whitewashing Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

"Various U.S. government leaders have since suggested that the missing 28 pages point to Saudi Arabia’s complicity in the 9/11 crimes. However such musings fail to discuss other important issues, like the links between the Saudi regime and the Western deep state, or the fact that, from the start, even the Saudis were calling for the 28 pages to be released."

The purpose of this new propaganda ploy is ultimately to sustain the legend that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks and that Saudi Arabia relentlessly supported Al Qaeda, namely that Saudi Arabia acted as a “state sponsor of terrorism”. In this regard, the media reports intimate that if the Saudi connection is confirmed by the 28 classified pages, this “would make 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war by a foreign government.”

There is, however, an obvious hiccup in this reasoning: if the Saudis were indeed the State sponsors of 9/11, why on earth did the US and the Atlantic Alliance (under the doctrine of collective security) choose to wage a “Just War” of retribution against Afghanistan. Did they get there countries mixed up?

posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 01:55 PM
Seems like a distraction. The Saudis may have indeed been involved but I suspect more disnfo to hide from our true perps. I look at who gained what and the Saudis had little benefit from the Patriot Act.

posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 02:11 PM

originally posted by: bobbypurify
Seems like a distraction. The Saudis may have indeed been involved but I suspect more disnfo to hide from our true perps. I look at who gained what and the Saudis had little benefit from the Patriot Act.

Iraq oil reserves. That's what the Saudi's wanted and still want. Their reserves have peaked and are in decline.

posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 02:13 PM
a reply to: InverseLookingGlass

In your opinion - do you think the Saudi oil protectors answer to the same powers that our US leadership does? Thanks!

Oh, and star for your answer.
edit on 20-4-2015 by bobbypurify because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 03:20 PM
Well it seems from what I have looked at, there is no backtracking from the Al Qaeda theme for just about everything..including 9/11.
Apart from 9/11 though, the FBI have used electronic surveillance like the rest of the PATRIOT actors, while still managing to let more recent events to 'slip under the radar' until they happened, and even though the FBI sees the PATRIOT Act the greatest thing since sliced bread.
This 'report' in any other situation, is of an organisation miffed at not being in with the big boys, but always did their best nevertheless.
It also decries the internet as a tool for other countries, and America not now being dominant in the technology as it once was, and kind of implies that domination made the world safe..pfff.


"The second trend involves the rapid pace of technology research and development (R&D),
which is now a challenging global phenomenon that was once wholly dominated by the United
States. According to the National Academies of Science, China— with 1.3 billion people—
today has the capacity for technological innovation, as does the tiny island nation of Singapore
(5.5 million people) in the Malaccan Straits, along with several Western countries.
Foreign R&D continues to make rapid advances in key areas such as IT, biotechnology, DNA
applications, nanotechnology, material sciences, neuroscience, and robotics—all with worrisome
dual-use implications. "

Dual-use implications eh? is that kind of saying again, when the US was dominant in these technologies, they were only ever used for 'good' purpose...believe that and you believe anything!

posted on Apr, 20 2015 @ 04:02 PM
Saudí can scream all she wants...

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"

Shes screams because she knows the US will NEVER release the 28 pages because its "bestest buddy in the whole Wide world forever and ever" (Israel) will be splattered all over the 28 along side.
edit on PM1Mon20151972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)

top topics

log in