It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: aboutface
If she received money from Saudi Arabia in my opinion that should also follow under the category of oppressive regimes. It is one of the most oppressive regimes in the world, it makes me livid that it is not in that category.
originally posted by: SubTruth
a reply to: Greathouse
It is obvious you are pretty vested in this emotionally.....So what I am about to say probably will be pointless but here we go........If you put faith and become emotionally vested in politicians you will be let down time after time.
Betting ATS posting rights is like playing Texas holdem with my pets........Years bring many things including wisdom. I raise you 20 kibbles.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Clearly about Saudi Arabia...
Funny thing is if he wins the election he'll kiss the Ring asap as well...
Hypocrites, all of them!!!
originally posted by: Battleline
a reply to: Greathouse
This "Glen Beck" tactic could make or brake Paul if what he has is as lame as Becks "I've got a secret and I'll tell ...when ever" BS.
This is so childish, why do they do this.
Newsweek may have one upped Paul with its article about Hillary and the pipe manufacture in the Ukraine that has been selling pipe to Iran during the time Hillary was sec of state ignoring sanctions and Hillary ignoring him selling Iran pipe when its her job as sec of state to deal with it.
Sorry, don't know how to copy and paste, I know, how lame. Anyway article title is" Clinton Donor Has trade Ties To Iran "
One is a member of the Saudi royal family. Another is a Ukrainian oligarch and former parliamentarian. Others are individuals with close connections to foreign governments that stem from their business activities. Their professed policy interests range from human rights to U.S.-Cuba relations.
All told, more than a dozen foreign individuals and their foundations and companies were large donors to the Clinton Foundation in the years after Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state in 2009, collectively giving between $34 million and $68 million, foundation records show. Some donors also provided funding directly to charitable projects sponsored by the foundation, valued by the organization at $60 million.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Greathouse
I am going to be real disappointed if the accusations turn out to be a tactic like the MSM uses.
All too often the media makes a big hoopla of a spectacle over things that turn out to be way off base, but they do it because they know the public remembers the accusation over the outcome. The media usually waits a bit then makes a token apology or small retraction to clear themselves knowing the damage is done.
I hope he is a better person than that. I guess we will have to wait and see. If he has something on her he should come forward right away instead of the theatrics IMO.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Clearly about Saudi Arabia...
Funny thing is if he wins the election he'll kiss the Ring asap as well...
Hypocrites, all of them!!!
Just had a curiosity have you ever looked into his background and the causes he's championed?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Clearly about Saudi Arabia...
Funny thing is if he wins the election he'll kiss the Ring asap as well...
Hypocrites, all of them!!!
Just had a curiosity have you ever looked into his background and the causes he's championed?
If you think that'll make a difference to how he acts as president, I don't know what to say to you.
I'll say it, he'll bow to the Saudi king like all the rest of them do.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Greathouse
I am going to be real disappointed if the accusations turn out to be a tactic like the MSM uses.
All too often the media makes a big hoopla of a spectacle over things that turn out to be way off base, but they do it because they know the public remembers the accusation over the outcome. The media usually waits a bit then makes a token apology or small retraction to clear themselves knowing the damage is done.
I hope he is a better person than that. I guess we will have to wait and see. If he has something on her he should come forward right away instead of the theatrics IMO.
So you're upset because a fellow Lib is getting publicly slimed like you Libs are always doing to Conservatives?
Suck it up buttercup. It's time Hilary Clinton get done to her what she has done to so many others?