Mystery Object Survives Trip To Black Hole

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: swanne


Can you give us an idea as to what potential ratios could exist?

Anything from 1:1 (object at rest) to ∞:1 (object moves at c).

By the time we reach 90% of the speed of light, for each day on board, two and a quarter days pass for an observer stationary with the respect to the Lattice. As we start tacking on nines to our velocity, time dilation becomes ever more extreme. At 0.999999 of the speed of light, almost two years pass in the Lattice for every ship's day. If we continue to accelerate to 0.99999999999999 c, for every day on board, nearly twenty thousand years pass for the observer at rest.

Source: www.fourmilab.ch...

Maybe it's the first evidence of a non super massIive black hole. In other words it's a smaller black hole orbiting a larger one.

Black holes are like spoons....


The truth is there is no spoon, just like there are no black holes.

Plan as day proof in your faces right here.

If there is supposed to be a star in the center of the cloud then why hasn't the star's gravity shredded the cloud and sucked it in?

he UCLA team has exquisite images from the Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea. The images for spring and summer 2014 show an unresolved compact object that didn’t brighten and stuck to its orbit during the pass, as you’d expect for a dust-enshrouded star. - See more at: www.skyandtelescope.com...

The suggestion that a massive object within the cloud passed through the hole without the emission of x-rays suggests to me that the massive object was some kind of proto-star composed of anti-protons.

But the paradox then is what was the attractive force - if any?

is it reall going close to black hole or is it just our perception of it ?are we looking at its orbit from the edge of its orbit?

originally posted by: mikelkhall
If there is supposed to be a star in the center of the cloud then why hasn't the star's gravity shredded the cloud and sucked it in?

Probably a newly born star and mass accretion takes an enormously long time

originally posted by: sy.gunson

The suggestion that a massive object within the cloud passed through the hole without the emission of x-rays suggests to me that the massive object was some kind of proto-star composed of anti-protons.

No offence mate, but this is just pseudoscientific mumble jumble. In which universe does antiprotons prevent emission of X-rays?

originally posted by: vind21
Black holes are like spoons....


The truth is there is no spoon, just like there are no black holes.

Plan as day proof in your faces right here.

So... A*'s mass of 4.6 millions Suns is the delirious fruit of our imagination?

a reply to: swanne

So... A*'s mass of 4.6 millions Suns is the delirious fruit of our imagination?

Maybe...

a reply to: swanne

Incredible, you know someone else here insisted it was different.

Thanks again Sir.

It is puzzling alright. Maybe the time compression around the BH has a critical range in which the objects approaching in this range behave the way they do, imo
a reply to: MysterX

a reply to: Kashai

originally posted by: DAVID64
Aliens using the black hole as a slingshot?
Give one Hell of a kick, save fuel and time. At least that's what I'd like to think. Think of the size of that ship if we can detect it from here!

Kinda impossile. With the work required to do that (energy), it would be much better to build a thousand atomic bombs. Some objects can escape black holes gravitational fields by bot getting inside the point of no return. After that, they are basically dead.