It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
10,000 baby sea lions have washed up dead on a California island, with experts calling the unexplained deaths a “crisis” and “[Pups] are washing ashore at a rate so alarming, rescuers said Thursday, this year is the worst yet”.
Experts at NOAA say that the culprit is rising ocean temperatures
… a NOAA climate expert said that they do not believe the stranding increase is tied to climate change.
On San Miguel… Melin said researchers believe “probably close to 10,000 are dead, and we expect more to die over coming months”… the mortality rate is similar on San Nicolas.
originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: Bluesma
The title of the article is wrong. It seems like the site is probably just trying to get hits. Nothing says 10K pups have washed up on shore. I think you can put this site in the "be very skeptical" list.
V
True, it says "close to 10,000" , but also, that is referring to only one island- they claim there is about the same on another of the Channel Islands. So that would indicate possibly much more than 10,000 already.
Sacramento Bee, Mar 7, 2015: Tens of thousands of pups birthed last summer are believed to be dying on the islands… some [are] desperately trying to climb onto small boats or kayaks… Scientists noted a worrisome anomaly in 2013, when 1,171 famished pups were stranded… scientists blamed the phenomenon on unseasonably cold waters… On San Miguel… Melin said researchers believe “probably close to 10,000 are dead, and we expect more to die over coming months”… the mortality rate is similar on San Nicolas.
Time: Experts at NOAA say that the culprit is rising ocean temperatures
- See more at: yournewswire.com...
originally posted by: Variable
No that is not true, it says 10,00 have washed up on shore. No where does it say that.
So its blamed on both cold water and warm water? Which is it? Again, it is an assumption that many pups have died, the article only mentions 5 or 6 dead pups washing ashore. It looks like a whole bunch of loosely linked articles pasted to look like a trend.
V
originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: Bluesma
Well therein shows how different we are. You see the incongruities and ignore them to seek out bits you think are important. I however see them and think the rest of the article is suspect. I think the article that started this can be found here: Starving sea lions
So I think here we have a article that has real information in it. Not sensational, no weird loosely based snippets. It expains why it is happening. It also says the current population is healthy.
V
And that was a quiet week compared to usual when there are anywhere from 15 to 20 die offs per week. Things are far from ALL GOOD but you keep telling yourself that.