It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you don't mind post the ballpark of this list in your post and i'll come back on it
originally posted by: [post=19096703]GetHyped Edit: better yet, pick an example from this list whose evidence was "reinterpreted" to fit GR and explain what the "correct" interpretation is and why:
if gravity works like that and in broads strokes Einstein believed that because he thought Mach was right; it is more the distant masses than nearby masses that are responsible for gravity and inertia. Feynman and Wheeler thought that this was due to a wave travelling backwards in time such that it's effects arrived instantly from the particles point's of view but if fact traveled at light speed so it did not violate physics as presently understood. this explains the instantaneous nature of the action of gravity and inertia.
originally posted by: LibertyKrueger
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Except that gravity may not be a force of its own, requiring the graviton as a force carrier. It may just be the constructive interference that the signals from one particle have on the back side signals of a nearby particle and vice versa. In that case, the signals responsible for gravitational effects would be the same ones that generate the particle structure of matter and not a separate phenomenon.