I would sue Hillary Clinton personally over the deaths at Benghazi if.....

Eric Holder too !!!

Fast and Furious-related emails between Holder and his wife Sharon Malone, and his mother, are currently being withheld under executive privilege invoked by President Obama.

-_Eric duh Red_-

a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah, sure, why not!

Because the only criteria I've seen in this thread, the only evidence for wrong doing, is that they're Democrats.

We want to convict based on not on what we know, but what we believe!

We believe that Clinton has done wrong. Forget 13 investigations that have proven otherwise.

Holder too! What is he hiding?

I'm still worried about Wisconson and Scott Walker though ... do you think we can trust him? There's lots of things he could hiding in his private email as well, huh?

Oh wait, only Democrats are guilty ... DOOH! Well, Democrats and black guys.

a reply to: xuenchen

And the thot plickens!

And it's not going to get any better under Loretta Lynch. The cover-ups and lies may even get worse. Few people know that Eric Holder's wife, Sharon Malone and Loretta Lynch were sorority sisters and there is a link here to the cover-up of Obama's use of a CT stolen SS number.

Lynch Job

a reply to: queenofswords

Yes, obamas stolen SS number...

Your snopes article pretty much goes against what you are trying to say, thanks for that link

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: xuenchen

And the thot plickens!

And it's not going to get any better under Loretta Lynch. The cover-ups and lies may even get worse. Few people know that Eric Holder's wife, Sharon Malone and Loretta Lynch were sorority sisters and there is a link here to the cover-up of Obama's use of a CT stolen SS number.

Lynch Job

Er, not for nothing, but from your link ...

FALSE: The connection between Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder was concealed until Orly Taitz uncovered it.

Is there some law broken here that isn't readily apparent?

That article was syndicated to the Chicago Tribune on the same day it was published in the Washington Post. Taitz may not have been aware of the articles trumpeting Lynch's connection to Holder's spouse when she published her claims; but given that the connection between the two women was specifically pointed out in stories run by major newspapers prior to Taitz's so-called revelation, it's clear Lynch's college friendship with Sharon Malone was no secret.

Also, since Snopes is a valid source:

This fantastical tale about President Barack Obama's having used a Social Security number (SSN) issued to a French immigrant named Jean Paul Ludwig, born in 1890, is easily debunked. As can be verified through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), a database of death records created from the United States Social Security Administration's Death Master File Extract, the Social Security Administration was in fact informed of Ludwig's death, and the Social Security number assigned to him was not, as claimed, the same as that assigned to Barack Obama (042-68-4425), but rather a completely different number (045-26-8722). Ludwig also didn't pass away until 1981, by which time Barack Obama had long since been assigned a Social Security number of his own:

Read more at www.snopes.com...

... or were you trying to disprove the nonsense that Obama stole someone's SSN?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: queenofswords

Yes, obamas stolen SS number...

Your snopes article pretty much goes against what you are trying to say, thanks for that link

I think you misread it. Re-read it again. If I am missing something in what you are saying, please elaborate.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Reading comprehension....please.

Taitz's findings were true. Her claim that she was the one that uncovered it first was false.

a reply to: queenofswords

First off by the mixture claim.

Even then, Taitz could only be "rather certain" Malone and Lynch were college friends and sorority sisters, so deeply buried was the secret link. Read more at www.snopes.com...

What Taitz either overlooked or left out is that a Washington Post profile of Lynch, published a full day earlier than Taitz's allegedly shocking revelation, had already openly discussed the history between Lynch, Malone, and Holder: Read more at www.snopes.com...

Taitz may not have been aware of the articles trumpeting Lynch's connection to Holder's spouse when she published her claims; but given that the connection between the two women was specifically pointed out in stories run by major newspapers prior to Taitz's so-called revelation, it's clear Lynch's college friendship with Sharon Malone was no secret. Read more at www.snopes.com...

It was no secret, she didn't uncover anything.
She just twisted and distorted it.

a reply to: queenofswords

Please, you want to try and go the reading comprehension route?

Few people know that Eric Holder's wife, Sharon Malone and Loretta Lynch were sorority sisters and there is a link here to the cover-up of Obama's use of a CT stolen SS number.

This was your quote, your article didn't offer anything but that they knew each other.

Snopes debunked the Jean Paul Ludwig SS#....

But, Taitz is still pushing for this investigation:

Why this connection is important? Holder covered up Obama's use of a stolen CT Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425 and Obama's use of bogus IDs. It seems that a long time college friend of Holder's wife was picked up as a gate keeper to continue all of the cover up by Holder and shield Holder and Obama from criminal prosecution.

a reply to: queenofswords

LOL ... I cited your article. Maybe you should look to your own comprehension.

Holder's wife knew Lynch in college.

What is illegal about it?

Also, speaking of reading comprehension on your source, what do you make of the absolute debunking of the garbage about a stolen SSN on the part of Obama ... you didn't miss that part too, did you?

Tsk. Yes, reading comprehension indeed.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Orly Taitz failed at her attempt to continue her controlled opposition efforts.

She did however do OK with the birth certificate issues.

Anything she does is automatically dismissed as false claims.

The perfect companion to the Obama psy-ops.

Never have to prove a thing.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
Under bush US embassys were attacked 13 times and over 60 people died.
Where was your outrage?.

Well obviously as Bush was a republican so you cannot blame him for any of them, but Clinton is a democrat so of course it is all her fault!

a reply to: xuenchen

So she is controlled op but did a good job at uncovering something?

I asked before, can you please teach me how to have my cake and eat it too?

"There are none so blind as those who will not see".

a reply to: xuenchen

Do you think that anything Ms. Taitz does is dismissed as false claims has anything to do with the fact that she's made so many false claims?

Anything? Or is it just coincidence.

Or Obama Psy Ops? (Whatever that is.)

originally posted by: EternalSolace
denying permission to operational forces within 30 minutes of the area from rescuing them?

Care to show us a valid source showing exactly where and what kind of troops were 30 minutes away?

originally posted by: queenofswords
there is a link here to the cover-up of Obama's use of a CT stolen SS number.

Funny how you use snopes as a source but never bothered to actually read it.... if you had read it you would have seen

as Taitz's long-since debunked claim that President Obama stole the Social Security number of a dead person

Taitz has been wrong and lost every single birther court case she has attempted, as all she and other birthers have are lies and silly made up stories. In fact silly birthers have lost every single court case they have attempted, 220 so far!

tesibria.typepad.com...

originally posted by: xuenchen
She did however do OK with the birth certificate issues.

No, she lost them as well.

Anything she does is automatically dismissed as false claims.

Wrong again, it is heard then dismissed as it is a load of crap, like all the birther nonsense.

Funny how some people try and blame democrats for anything and everything, but give republicans a free pass for everything!

a reply to: hellobruce

Hello, hellobruce. Yes, I used Snopes even though they are known to be less than totally transparent and even evasive sometimes.

They debunked the Jean Paul Ludwig social security connection.

The connection to Obama's use of a stolen CT Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425 and Obama's use of bogus IDs has NOT been totally debunked, however.

If this thread turns into the Obama Social Security controversy, maybe somebody can start a new topic.