Atheist, Politics and God

a reply to: BELIEVERpriest

I still am leaning quite heavily towards the thought that it was a Freudian slip....

a reply to: nullafides

it is a minor anomaly... the anomaly exists none the less as observed in nature.

this does not mean the anomaly is the majority with which we rule by, or standardize with.

a reply to: AinElohim

a reply to: nullafides

Yeah, well Freud was high on coke at the times, so if you want to follow the ravings of an addict, thats fine by me.

originally posted by: AinElohim
a reply to: nullafides

it is a minor anomaly... the anomaly exists none the less as observed in nature.

this does not mean the anomaly is the majority with which we rule by, or standardize with.

Aha....so, one's a sin...the other is an "anomaly"....

NOW I UNDERSTAND YOU!!!!

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AinElohim

If you buy the conspiracy, the highest echelon in TPTB are Satanists. It's a super-secret Satanic Cabal.

Of course, the funny thing about the angry atheists is that they claim to be just as moral as Christians and tend to measure that by Christian standards when they make their proofs.

ah wisdom is a beautiful thing when one is graced with it...

thanks for your input

I know Satan, I can introduce you if you like?

originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: nullafides

Yeah, well Freud was high on coke at the times, so if you want to follow the ravings of an addict, thats fine by me.

Well, a fair number of folks were at the time, as it was "socially acceptable"....

So, cast the glowing beams of religiously furious disdain from your eyes elsewhere....his contributions and importance to society will out last yours....

a reply to: nullafides

Well one is a natural attraction to the same sex...
Either via personality or physically...
Which doesn't have to involve physical contact...

The other is called "rape" in our lexicon simply because is it not about an attraction to one another and consent, but asserting dominance in the Wild...



& neither is a sin really, but both completely different.

a reply to: Klassified

yes sir... it's that time of the year again.


what can I say? I am trying to enjoy the upcoming summer.

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: nullafides

Well one is a natural attraction to the same sex...
Either via personality or physically...
Which doesn't have to involve physical contact...

The other is called "rape" in our lexicon simply because is it not about an attraction to one another and consent, but asserting dominance in the Wild...



& neither is a sin really, but both completely different.

Sooooo...a homosexual act is different when done by humans...

GOTCHYA!!!

originally posted by: AinElohim

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Most atheists are just as kind and caring as believers...
Tolerant too.

I don't believe that...

When you get down to that which matters most, they fall short and fail in morals and ethics.

Also history teaches us that this is something we should be very cautious of, unbelievers are dangerous in my opinion.

Sensing a threat of danger invokes preemptism...

That's funny, coming from a guy who posted this pic in another thread.



I'm beginning to think you're full of crap.

👣

a reply to: nullafides

The pseudo-science society?

Good for him.


How about the overall cosmic balance of all life that ever existed and will exist into infinite...

Will his coke fueled contributions obsessions with incest still be of the upmost importance?


Sigmund Fraud!!!

a reply to: BlueMule

Beginning to think? You're being nice...admit it, you smelled it before you opened it.....the sh&t that is...you smelled the sh&t....

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AinElohim

Of course, the funny thing about the angry atheists is that they claim to be just as moral as Christians and tend to measure that by Christian standards when they make their proofs.

Matt. 7

2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.

a reply to: AinElohim

They think that the value and moral worth of a human being is determined by their IQ level, and they the atheists themselves being the smartest lot on the planet apparently want to be the ruling class.

It's true. It's all true!

Every night this is true.

Every night we.....

...try and take over the World!!

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: nullafides

The pseudo-science society?

Good for him.


How about the overall cosmic balance of all life that ever existed and will exist into infinite...

Will his coke fueled contributions obsessions with incest still be of the upmost importance?


Sigmund Fraud!!!

I'm glad to see you suffer no lack of opinions.

I'm sad to see you don't have much of an understanding of what your opinions are about.

Good luck with that.

originally posted by: nullafides
a reply to: BlueMule

Beginning to think? You're being nice...admit it, you smelled it before you opened it.....the sh&t that is...you smelled the sh&t....

I admit it, I'm a very nice guy.

👣

a reply to: nullafides

You know, in Hitler's day, it was a cool thing to starve people in concentration camps. I guess that makes it ok. BTW, I dont care who does what drug, but its pretty stupid to follow the advice of a pychological researcher who had his mind clouded with a mind altering substances. Do you need as stoner to tell you how to think?

Whats your problem anyways, I was trying to stick up for the atheists?

a reply to: BlueMule

oh no... don't even go there!

Atheists are like the gender neutrals, they must have a purpose?

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

I don't really know what atheistic morals are though.

So I can't really answer that.

Nor do I.

There are both immoral and moral atheists.

I draw my morality from a wide range of sources, and not from one source of dogma. The only thing that has to do with my atheism is the fact my lack of belief in any religious god necessarily excludes all religious dogma.